People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Abrahami, Shoshan
Delft University of Technology
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (10/10 displayed)
- 2024Surface engineering of aerospace aluminium alloyscitations
- 2021Scrutinizing the importance of surface chemistry versus surface roughness for aluminium/sol-gel film adhesioncitations
- 2020Nanorods grown by copper anodizing in sodium carbonatecitations
- 2020A Review on Anodizing of Aerospace Aluminum Alloys for Corrosion Protectioncitations
- 2020Effect of surface roughness and chemistry on the adhesion and durability of a steel-epoxy adhesive interfacecitations
- 2018Advanced (In Situ) Surface Analysis of Organic Coating/Metal Oxide Interactions for Corrosion Protection of Passivated Metalscitations
- 2017Towards Cr(VI)-free anodization of aluminum alloys for aerospace adhesive bonding applicationscitations
- 2017Adhesive bonding and corrosion performance investigated as a function of auminum oide chemistry and adhesivescitations
- 2016Potentiodynamic anodizing of aluminum alloys in Cr(VI)-free electrolytescitations
- 2015XPS Analysis of the Surface Chemistry and Interfacial Bonding of Barrier-Type Cr(VI)-Free Anodic Oxidescitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
XPS Analysis of the Surface Chemistry and Interfacial Bonding of Barrier-Type Cr(VI)-Free Anodic Oxides
Abstract
In the transition to environmental friendly pretreatment of aerospace aluminum alloys, chromic acid anodizing (CAA) is being replaced by sulfuric acid (SAA), phosphoric acid (PAA), or phosphoric-sulfuric acid (PSA) anodizing. While generally the main concern is controlling the film morphology, such as the pore diameter, oxide-, and barrier layer thickness, little is known on how the anodic oxide chemistry affects the interactions at the interface upon adhesive bonding. To study the link between surface chemistry and interfacial bonding, featureless oxides were prepared by stopping the anodizing during the formation of the barrier layer. A model was developed to quantify the relative amounts of OH–, PO43–, and SO42– by curve-fitting the XPS data. Calculations showed that almost 40% of the surface species in PAA oxide are phosphates (PO43–), whereas about 15% are sulfates (SO42) in SAA. When both anions were present in the electrolyte, phosphate incorporation was inhibited. Studies of the interaction between this set of Cr(VI)-free oxides and diethylenetriamine (DETA)—an amine curing-agent for epoxy resin—showed that all oxides interact with the nitrogen of DETA. However, larger ratios of Lewis-like acid–base bonding between the amine electron pair and the acidic hydroxyl on phosphate surface sites were observed.