Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Hoskin, Ben

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 5

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021Behavior of Methane Hydrate-in-Water Slurries from Shut-in to Flow Restart5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sakurai, Shunsuke
1 / 3 shared
Norris, Bruce
1 / 3 shared
Aman, Zachary M.
1 / 5 shared
Choi, Joel
1 / 3 shared
May, Eric
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sakurai, Shunsuke
  • Norris, Bruce
  • Aman, Zachary M.
  • Choi, Joel
  • May, Eric
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Behavior of Methane Hydrate-in-Water Slurries from Shut-in to Flow Restart

  • Sakurai, Shunsuke
  • Norris, Bruce
  • Aman, Zachary M.
  • Hoskin, Ben
  • Choi, Joel
  • May, Eric
Abstract

<p>Natural gas hydrates have attracted interest as a potential future energy resource to meet the expected growth in the global energy demand. One of the key challenges to be tackled for commercial production is gas hydrate re-formation in production lines. Such hydrate blockages have been a major concern of flow assurance in the oil and gas industries, and typically occur during start-up, shut-in, and restart operations. This study sheds light on the behavior of methane hydrate slurries in pure water systems under shut-in conditions and their transition to solid blockages during system restart: a key risk factor in gas hydrate production. Flowloop experiments were conducted to measure the critical stress required to restart flow in hydrate slurries, which were accompanied by visual observations using an in-line video camera. A transition from smooth restart to a critical stress requirement was observed at 4-5 vol % of hydrate; visually, this corresponded to complete occupancy of the flow cross section with porous aggregated hydrate particles in a loosely packed network. The critical stress increased with higher hydrate volume fractions per the behavior of yield stress for a general suspension: it was not affected by the shut-in period, suggesting that annealing was not a factor at the volume fractions measured. Further, hydrate blockage occurred in several restart operations at approximately 18 vol % of hydrate even though the video camera had captured partial yielding before the blockage occurred. These results show a progression in slurry behavior as a function of hydrate volume fraction, offering insights into varied mechanisms for blockage formation, and operational strategies to minimize blockage risk.</p>

Topics
  • porous
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • annealing