Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Minaev, Boris

  • Google
  • 4
  • 20
  • 235

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2022Synthesis and Spectroscopic Characterization of Selected Phenothiazines and Phenazines Rationalized Based on DFT Calculation5citations
  • 2022Dianthracenylazatrioxa[8]circulene: synthesis, characterization and application in OLEDs10citations
  • 2017Singlet Oxygen Photophysics in Liquid Solvents: Converging on a Unified Picture110citations
  • 2017Singlet Oxygen Photophysics in Liquid Solvents110citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Karaush-Karmazin, Nataliya
2 / 2 shared
Kusz, Joachim
1 / 5 shared
Książek, Maria
1 / 1 shared
Podsiadly, Radoslaw
1 / 1 shared
Swoboda, Daniel
1 / 1 shared
Nycz, Jacek
1 / 2 shared
Stakhira, Pavlo
1 / 1 shared
Broløs, Line M.
1 / 1 shared
Pedersen, Stephan K.
1 / 2 shared
Pedersen, Viktor B.
1 / 1 shared
Ågren, Hans
1 / 4 shared
Pittelkow, Michael
1 / 6 shared
Valiev, Rashid R.
1 / 2 shared
Kamounah, Fadhil S.
1 / 3 shared
Ivaniuk, Khrystyna
1 / 1 shared
Baryshnikov, Glib V.
1 / 2 shared
Bregnhøj, Mikkel
2 / 3 shared
Ogilby, Peter Remsen
1 / 1 shared
Westberg, Michael
2 / 2 shared
Ogilby, Peter
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Karaush-Karmazin, Nataliya
  • Kusz, Joachim
  • Książek, Maria
  • Podsiadly, Radoslaw
  • Swoboda, Daniel
  • Nycz, Jacek
  • Stakhira, Pavlo
  • Broløs, Line M.
  • Pedersen, Stephan K.
  • Pedersen, Viktor B.
  • Ågren, Hans
  • Pittelkow, Michael
  • Valiev, Rashid R.
  • Kamounah, Fadhil S.
  • Ivaniuk, Khrystyna
  • Baryshnikov, Glib V.
  • Bregnhøj, Mikkel
  • Ogilby, Peter Remsen
  • Westberg, Michael
  • Ogilby, Peter
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Singlet Oxygen Photophysics in Liquid Solvents

  • Minaev, Boris
  • Bregnhøj, Mikkel
  • Ogilby, Peter
  • Westberg, Michael
Abstract

<p>ConspectusSinglet oxygen, O<sub>2</sub>(a<sup>1</sup>Δ<sub>g</sub>), the lowest excited electronic state of molecular oxygen, is an omnipresent part of life on earth. It is readily formed through a variety of chemical and photochemical processes, and its unique reactions are important not just as a tool in chemical syntheses but also in processes that range from polymer degradation to signaling in biological cells. For these reasons, O<sub>2</sub>(a<sup>1</sup>Δ<sub>g</sub>) has been the subject of intense activity in a broad distribution of scientific fields for the past ∼50 years.The characteristic reactions of O<sub>2</sub>(a<sup>1</sup>Δ<sub>g</sub>) kinetically compete with processes that deactivate this excited state to the ground state of oxygen, O<sub>2</sub>(X<sup>3</sup>ςg<sup>-</sup>). Moreover, O<sub>2</sub>(a<sup>1</sup>Δ<sub>g</sub>) is ideally monitored using one of these deactivation channels: O<sub>2</sub>(a<sup>1</sup>Δ<sub>g</sub>) → O<sub>2</sub>(X<sup>3</sup>ςg<sup>-</sup>) phosphorescence at 1270 nm. Thus, there is ample justification to study and control these competing processes, including those mediated by solvents, and the chemistry community has likewise actively tackled this issue.In themselves, the solvent-mediated radiative and nonradiative transitions between the three lowest-lying electronic states of oxygen [O<sub>2</sub>(X<sup>3</sup>ςg<sup>-</sup>), O<sub>2</sub>(a<sup>1</sup>Δ<sub>g</sub>), and O<sub>2</sub>(b<sup>1</sup>ςg<sup>+</sup>)] are relevant to issues at the core of modern chemistry. In the isolated oxygen molecule, these transitions are forbidden by quantum-mechanical selection rules. However, solvent molecules perturb oxygen in such a way as to make these transitions more probable. Most interestingly, the effect of a series of solvents on the O<sub>2</sub>(X<sup>3</sup>ςg<sup>-</sup>)-O<sub>2</sub>(b<sup>1</sup>ςg<sup>+</sup>) transition, for example, can be totally different from the effect of the same series of solvents on the O<sub>2</sub>(X<sup>3</sup>ςg<sup>-</sup>)-O<sub>2</sub>(a<sup>1</sup>Δ<sub>g</sub>) transition. Moreover, a given solvent that appreciably increases the probability of a radiative transition generally does not provide a correspondingly viable pathway for nonradiative energy loss, and vice versa.The ∼50 years of experimental work leading to these conclusions were not easy; spectroscopically monitoring such weak and low-energy transitions in time-resolved experiments is challenging. Consequently, results obtained from different laboratories often were not consistent. In turn, attempts to interpret molecular events were often simplistic and/or misguided. However, over the recent past, increasingly accurate experiments have converged on a base of credible data, finally forming a consistent picture of this system that is resonant with theoretical models. The concepts involved encompass a large fraction of chemistry's fundamental lexicon, e.g., spin-orbit coupling, state mixing, quantum tunneling, electronic-to-vibrational energy transfer, activation barriers, collision complexes, and charge-transfer interactions.In this Account, we provide an explanatory overview of the ways in which a given solvent will perturb the radiative and nonradiative transitions between the O<sub>2</sub>(X<sup>3</sup>ςg<sup>-</sup>), O<sub>2</sub>(a<sup>1</sup>Δ<sub>g</sub>), and O<sub>2</sub>(b<sup>1</sup>ςg<sup>+</sup>) states.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • experiment
  • Oxygen
  • forming
  • activation
  • phosphorescence