Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Leitao, J.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 10
  • 3

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2008Shear bond strength of aged dental amalgam repaired with composite3citations
  • 2007Clinical performance of an experimental veneering composite in FPDS. One-year reportcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Jardim, L.
1 / 2 shared
Portugal, Jaime
2 / 14 shared
Marques, P.
1 / 27 shared
Pereira, C.
1 / 55 shared
Marques, M.
1 / 4 shared
Bernardo, Mf
1 / 1 shared
Rabaco, P.
1 / 1 shared
Gonzalez, L.
1 / 5 shared
Mourao, T.
1 / 1 shared
Tavares, Av
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2008
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Jardim, L.
  • Portugal, Jaime
  • Marques, P.
  • Pereira, C.
  • Marques, M.
  • Bernardo, Mf
  • Rabaco, P.
  • Gonzalez, L.
  • Mourao, T.
  • Tavares, Av
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Shear bond strength of aged dental amalgam repaired with composite

  • Jardim, L.
  • Portugal, Jaime
  • Marques, P.
  • Leitao, J.
Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatment and adhesive agent on the shear bond strength between a resin composite and an aged dental amalgam (356-days). Materials and Methods: Sixty amalgam(Tytin) disks were stored in water at 37°C for 365 days. Half of the specimens were airborne particle abraded and the remaining half was roughened with a greenstone. Resin composite cylinders (Tetric) were bonded onto the amalgam surfaces using Amalgambond, All-Bond 2 or Scotchbond 1 (n=10). Specimens were stored in water at 37°C for 7 days and thermocycled.Shear bond strength testing was carried on an Instron Universal Testing Machine. Stereomicroscope examination was carried out to determine the bond failure sites. Results were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Student- Newman-Keuls' post-hoc tests and the level of statistical significance was set at 5%. Results: Surface treatment significantly affected the shearbond strengths (p<0.001) with airborne particle abrasion producing the highest bond strengths. Significantly higher shear bond strengths (p=0.047) were found with Scotchbond 1 in comparison with All-Bond 2, in the airborne particle abraded specimens. Bond failures were predominantly of the adhesive type. Conclusions: Airborne particle abrasion resulted in a twofold increase in shear bond strength compared with roughening with a greenstone. Significant differences were found between the adhesives, in the airborne particle abraded specimens.

Topics
  • surface
  • strength
  • composite
  • resin