Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kassi, Jean-Pierre

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 46

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2002Mechanical conditions in the internal stabilization of proximal tibial defects46citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Khodadadyan, Cyros
1 / 1 shared
Haas, Norbert P.
1 / 1 shared
Duda, Georg N.
1 / 14 shared
Mandruzzato, Francesco
1 / 1 shared
Heller, Markus O.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2002

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Khodadadyan, Cyros
  • Haas, Norbert P.
  • Duda, Georg N.
  • Mandruzzato, Francesco
  • Heller, Markus O.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Mechanical conditions in the internal stabilization of proximal tibial defects

  • Kassi, Jean-Pierre
  • Khodadadyan, Cyros
  • Haas, Norbert P.
  • Duda, Georg N.
  • Mandruzzato, Francesco
  • Heller, Markus O.
Abstract

Objectives<br/>The goal was to design a method which would permit an assessment of the suitability of a newly developed implant under physiological-like loading conditions. Information obtained from such an analysis is expected to delineate more clearly the indications for a new device prior to clinical utilization.<br/><br/>Design<br/>In vitro mechanical stiffness testing and finite element analysis.<br/><br/>Methods<br/>From in vitro testing of proximal tibiae with defects, the stiffness of an internal stabilization system was determined. Using a finite element model, the loading of both the implant and bone was analyzed including all muscle forces. The variation in implant loading and interfragmentary strain for different defect locations was also investigated.<br/><br/>Results<br/>Conventional stiffness testing demonstrated the comparability of the experimental findings with the finite element predictions. Under physiological-like loading the implant experienced high bending and von Mises stresses if defects in the region of the shaft were stabilized. A short working length increased implant loading up to the yield strength of the material.<br/><br/>Conclusions<br/>The finite element analysis illustrated the appropriateness of this new device for proximal defects of the tibia, but the implant should be used hesitantly in fractures or defects extending into the diaphyseal region of the bone.<br/><br/>Relevance<br/>This new analytical approach helped to identify clinical indications for the implant in which its mechanical attributes would prove advantageous.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • defect
  • yield strength
  • finite element analysis