Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Jamsa, T.

  • Google
  • 3
  • 8
  • 96

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2003Biocompatibility of austenite and martensite phases in NiTi-based alloys6citations
  • 2002Effect of metal alloy surface stresses on the viability of ROS-17/2.8 osteoblastic cells20citations
  • 2002Bone modeling controlled by a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy intramedullary nail70citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tuukkanen, J.
3 / 5 shared
Pramila, A.
2 / 3 shared
Danilov, A.
3 / 5 shared
Kujala, S.
2 / 4 shared
Ryhänen, Jorma
3 / 6 shared
Saaranen, J.
2 / 2 shared
Kapanen, A.
2 / 2 shared
Lehenkari, P.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2003
2002

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tuukkanen, J.
  • Pramila, A.
  • Danilov, A.
  • Kujala, S.
  • Ryhänen, Jorma
  • Saaranen, J.
  • Kapanen, A.
  • Lehenkari, P.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effect of metal alloy surface stresses on the viability of ROS-17/2.8 osteoblastic cells

  • Tuukkanen, J.
  • Danilov, A.
  • Ryhänen, Jorma
  • Lehenkari, P.
  • Kapanen, A.
  • Jamsa, T.
Abstract

In this study we compared the effect of structural stresses and surface roughness on biocompatibility of NiTi- and Ti-alloy for ROS-17/2.8 osteoblastic cells. We suggest here that cell viability and cell attachment are linear functions of internal (structural) stress and subgrain size of the implant alloy. However, this is not the case with surface roughness. The two-phase state in these materials is characterized by different mean values of structural stresses (sigma) in alpha-martensite and beta-phase. We found a straight correlation between cell viability and sigma(beta)/sigma(alpha) ratio. Atomic force microscopy revealed that, even after equal surface polishing treatments, roughness varied significantly between the different alloys. The effect of the surface structure of the alloy on the osteoblastic ROS-17/2.8 cell survival rate was studied with combined calcein-ethidium-homodimer fluorescence labeling. The possible effects on cell attachment to substrate were studied by staining the focal contacts with paxillin antibody. All the NiTi surfaces were tolerated well and the cells attached most abundantly to the roughest NiTi surface but the smoothest Ti-alloy surface. However, other parameters of the material state, such as the surface stresses created by hot rolling seem to be responsible for some of the attachment and cell survival features observed in this study. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • phase
  • atomic force microscopy
  • biocompatibility
  • polishing
  • hot rolling