Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Soria, Federico

  • Google
  • 4
  • 28
  • 81

Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2022Interactive Effects of Copper-Doped Urological Implants with Tissue in the Urinary Tract for the Inhibition of Cell Adhesion and Encrustation in the Animal Model Rat3citations
  • 2021Potential strategies to prevent encrustations on urinary stents and catheters - thinking outside the box: a European network of multidisciplinary research to improve urinary stents (ENIUS) initiative10citations
  • 2018Evaluation of a New Design of Antireflux-biodegradable Ureteral Stent in Animal Model.42citations
  • 2011Combined x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy studies of the LiBH4–MgH2 reactive hydride composite with and without a Ti-based additive26citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Rebl, Henrike
1 / 2 shared
Haag, Antonia
1 / 1 shared
Renner, Jürgen
1 / 1 shared
Wienecke, Marion
1 / 2 shared
Cruz, Julia E. De La
1 / 1 shared
Kram, Wolfgang
2 / 3 shared
Springer, Armin
1 / 7 shared
Epting, Thomas
1 / 1 shared
Hakenberg, Oliver W.
1 / 1 shared
Clavica, Francesco
1 / 2 shared
Reis, Rui L.
1 / 189 shared
Abou-Hassan, Ali
1 / 6 shared
Carugo, Dario
1 / 7 shared
Skovorodkin, Ilya
1 / 3 shared
Zheng, Shaokai
1 / 1 shared
Buchholz, Noor
1 / 1 shared
Barros, Alexandre
1 / 2 shared
De La Cruz, Julia
1 / 1 shared
De Graaf, Petra
1 / 1 shared
Mergulhao, Filipe
1 / 1 shared
Vainio, Seppo
1 / 3 shared
Fernández-Camacho, A.
1 / 19 shared
Deprez, E.
1 / 5 shared
Muñoz-Márquez, Miguel Ángel
1 / 4 shared
Palomares, F. Javier
1 / 10 shared
Bormann, R.
1 / 31 shared
Dornheim, M.
1 / 52 shared
Jiménez De Haro, María Del Carmen
1 / 10 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2018
2011

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Rebl, Henrike
  • Haag, Antonia
  • Renner, Jürgen
  • Wienecke, Marion
  • Cruz, Julia E. De La
  • Kram, Wolfgang
  • Springer, Armin
  • Epting, Thomas
  • Hakenberg, Oliver W.
  • Clavica, Francesco
  • Reis, Rui L.
  • Abou-Hassan, Ali
  • Carugo, Dario
  • Skovorodkin, Ilya
  • Zheng, Shaokai
  • Buchholz, Noor
  • Barros, Alexandre
  • De La Cruz, Julia
  • De Graaf, Petra
  • Mergulhao, Filipe
  • Vainio, Seppo
  • Fernández-Camacho, A.
  • Deprez, E.
  • Muñoz-Márquez, Miguel Ángel
  • Palomares, F. Javier
  • Bormann, R.
  • Dornheim, M.
  • Jiménez De Haro, María Del Carmen
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Evaluation of a New Design of Antireflux-biodegradable Ureteral Stent in Animal Model.

  • Soria, Federico
Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To determine the effects in urinary tract of a new antireflux-biodegradable ureteral stent. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Thirty six ureters belonging to 24 pigs were used. The study began with endoscopic, nephrosonographic, and fluoroscopic assessments. Three study groups of ureters (n = 12) were then specified. In group I, a biodegradable antireflux ureteral stent (BDG-ARS) was inserted in the right ureter of 12 pigs. Group II comprised the left ureter of the same animals, in which a double-pigtail stent was placed for 6 weeks. Group III ureters, belonging to 12 additional animals, were subjected to a ureteropelvic junction obstruction model that was then treated by endopyelotomy and stenting with BDG-ARS. Follow-ups were performed at 3-6 weeks and at 5 months. RESULTS:None of the ureters receiving the BDG-ARS showed any evidence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). BDG-ARS degradation took place in a controlled and predictable fashion from the third to the sixth weeks, and no obstructive fragments appeared. No differences were found between groups I and II regarding passive ureteral dilation, but significant differences were found regarding VUR and ureteral orifice damage. BDG-ARS always maintained distal ureteral peristalsis. BDG-ARS in group III showed a 50% positive urine culture rate and a 16.6% migration rate in both BDG-ARS groups. CONCLUSION:BDG-ARS avoided VUR and bladder trigone irritation. In addition, this polymer combination and stent-braided design achieved a consistent biodegradation rate with no obstructive fragments and with uniform degradation between the third and the sixth weeks. Consequently, morbidity associated with ureteral stents might be reduced.

Topics
  • polymer
  • ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy