Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Tonry, Catherine

  • Google
  • 8
  • 28
  • 69

University of Greenwich

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2023Controlling solute channel formation using magnetic fieldscitations
  • 2021Enhancement of mechanical properties of pure aluminium through contactless melt sonicating treatment8citations
  • 2020Acoustic resonance for contactless ultrasonic cavitation in alloy melts27citations
  • 2020Progress in the development of a contactless ultrasonic processing route for alloy grain refinement1citations
  • 2020Contactless ultrasonic treatment in direct chill castingcitations
  • 2019The contactless electromagnetic sonotrode6citations
  • 2019Contactless ultrasonic cavitation in alloy melts15citations
  • 2013Microstructure formation in a thick polymer by electrostatic-induced lithography12citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Pericleous, Koulis
7 / 46 shared
Kao, Andrew
1 / 3 shared
Fan, Xianqiang
1 / 4 shared
Lee, Peter D.
1 / 43 shared
Eckert, Sven
1 / 7 shared
Shevchenko, Natalia
1 / 4 shared
Atwood, Robert C.
1 / 11 shared
Clark, Samuel J.
1 / 6 shared
Bojarevics, Valdis
6 / 40 shared
Dybalska, Agnieszka
3 / 3 shared
Nashwan, Zakareya
1 / 2 shared
Djambazov, Georgi
6 / 17 shared
Griffiths, William D.
2 / 2 shared
Caden, Adrian
1 / 1 shared
Beckwith, C.
2 / 4 shared
Dybalska, A.
2 / 2 shared
Griffiths, W. D.
2 / 3 shared
Griffiths, William
1 / 1 shared
Gao, J.
1 / 10 shared
Cargill, Scott
1 / 2 shared
Kay, Robert W.
1 / 12 shared
Yu, W.
1 / 11 shared
Desmulliez, Mpy
1 / 49 shared
Flynn, David
1 / 25 shared
Bailey, Christopher
1 / 2 shared
Liu, G.
1 / 28 shared
Patel, Mayur K.
1 / 3 shared
Li, H.
1 / 34 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2021
2020
2019
2013

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Pericleous, Koulis
  • Kao, Andrew
  • Fan, Xianqiang
  • Lee, Peter D.
  • Eckert, Sven
  • Shevchenko, Natalia
  • Atwood, Robert C.
  • Clark, Samuel J.
  • Bojarevics, Valdis
  • Dybalska, Agnieszka
  • Nashwan, Zakareya
  • Djambazov, Georgi
  • Griffiths, William D.
  • Caden, Adrian
  • Beckwith, C.
  • Dybalska, A.
  • Griffiths, W. D.
  • Griffiths, William
  • Gao, J.
  • Cargill, Scott
  • Kay, Robert W.
  • Yu, W.
  • Desmulliez, Mpy
  • Flynn, David
  • Bailey, Christopher
  • Liu, G.
  • Patel, Mayur K.
  • Li, H.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Acoustic resonance for contactless ultrasonic cavitation in alloy melts

  • Pericleous, Koulis
  • Tonry, Catherine
  • Beckwith, C.
  • Bojarevics, Valdis
  • Djambazov, Georgi
  • Dybalska, A.
  • Griffiths, W. D.
Abstract

Contactless ultrasound is a novel, easily implemented, technique for the Ultrasonic Treatment (UST) of liquid metals. Instead of using a vibrating sonotrode probe inside the melt, which leads to contamination, we consider a high AC frequency electromagnetic coil placed close to the metal free surface. The coil induces a rapidly changing Lorentz force, which in turn excites sound waves. To reach the necessary pressure amplitude for cavitation with the minimum electrical energy use, it was found necessary to achieve acoustic resonance in the liquid volume, by finely tuning the coil AC supply frequency. The appearance of cavitation was then detected experimentally with an externally placed ultrasonic microphone and confirmed by the reduction in grain size of the solidified metal. To predict the appearance of various resonant modes numerically, the exact dimensions of the melt volume, the holding crucible, surrounding structures and their sound properties are required. As cavitation progresses the speed of sound in the melt changes, which in practice means resonance becomes intermittent. Given the complexity of the situation, two competing numerical models are used to compute the soundfield. A high order time-domain method focusing on a particular forcing frequency and a Helmholtz frequency domain method scanning the full frequency range of the power supply. A good agreement is achieved between the two methods and experiments which means the optimal setup for the process can be predicted with some accuracy.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • grain
  • grain size
  • experiment
  • melt
  • ultrasonic