Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Czapski, Paweł

  • Google
  • 1
  • 1
  • 8

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023The influence of manufacturing on the buckling performance of thin-walled, channel-section CFRP profiles—An experimental and numerical study8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lunt, Alexander J. G.
1 / 31 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lunt, Alexander J. G.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The influence of manufacturing on the buckling performance of thin-walled, channel-section CFRP profiles—An experimental and numerical study

  • Czapski, Paweł
  • Lunt, Alexander J. G.
Abstract

<p>The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of manufacturing on the buckling and post-buckling behaviour of thin-walled, columns made from CFRP. Static compression was performed on channel-section profiles with dimensions equal to 80 mm × 38 mm × 240 mm (web × flange × length of profile) composed of an eight-layered symmetric laminate [45/−45/45/−45] and a thickness of 0.92 mm. The samples were manufactured by two distinct methods: 1) conventional lamination of a channel, and 2) by manufacturing a square cross-section and cutting it into two channels. Buckling tests showed that the second method is 2.5 times more material efficient and provides 18 % higher buckling resistance. Moreover, three finite element models were implemented—a​ model that did not include any prestress (residual stresses), and simulations of the channel and square cross sections where residual stresses were included. The conventional channels matched the numerical results of the model which did not include any prestress (nominal error of 1.8%). Whereas the buckling response of the square cross section samples were substantially influenced by the residual stresses (18.1% increase in buckling load). These results have significant implications for the design/production of CFRP channels with enhanced buckling performance.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • layered