Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Robinson, Trevor T.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 3

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Quantifying the Sensitivity of Plate Aspect Ratio and Edge Boundary Conditions on CFRP Plate Impact and Post Impact Residual Strength3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Nolan, Declan
1 / 1 shared
Quinn, Damian
1 / 7 shared
Murphy, Adrian
1 / 52 shared
Harley, Cara
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Nolan, Declan
  • Quinn, Damian
  • Murphy, Adrian
  • Harley, Cara
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Quantifying the Sensitivity of Plate Aspect Ratio and Edge Boundary Conditions on CFRP Plate Impact and Post Impact Residual Strength

  • Nolan, Declan
  • Quinn, Damian
  • Murphy, Adrian
  • Robinson, Trevor T.
  • Harley, Cara
Abstract

Much literature exists on composite plate impact damage and residual strength post impact, but there is limited work which systematically examines how plate behaviour alters with plate aspect ratio and edge rotational restraint. Through simulation of composite stiffened plates under low velocity impact and Compression After Impact loading, the presented work demonstrates that laminate impact response and subsequent residual strength is highly sensitive to both plate aspect ratio and boundary conditions. Increasing edge restraint for low aspect ratio plates results in a moderate increase (up to 13.3%) in residual strength. Conversely, for higher aspect ratio plates (representative of aircraft stiffened panel components), the same change in edge restraint results in an equivalent decrease in residual strength (up to 13.0%). In particular, the interaction between impact induced damage and the onset of plate buckling observed in higher aspect ratio plates, and the subsequent effect on predicted residual strength, is not captured when examining low aspect ratio plates utilised in traditional material coupon testing practices.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • simulation
  • strength
  • composite
  • impact response