Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Dias, Hanwellage Yomal Viduranga

  • Google
  • 3
  • 1
  • 60

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2019Fire performance of steel and plasterboard sheathed non-load bearing LSF walls31citations
  • 2019Axial compression strength of gypsum plasterboard and steel sheathed web-stiffened stud walls26citations
  • 2017Numerical modelling of steel sheathed LSF walls under fire conditions3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Poologanathan, Keerthan
3 / 70 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Poologanathan, Keerthan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Axial compression strength of gypsum plasterboard and steel sheathed web-stiffened stud walls

  • Dias, Hanwellage Yomal Viduranga
  • Poologanathan, Keerthan
Abstract

Cold-formed steel-framed walls lined with appropriate sheathing materials are increasingly being used as vertical load bearing systems due to their many benefits. Despite this widespread use, attempts at improving their structural efficiency using either optimised studs or novel sheathing elements have been scarce. Arguably, the sustained use of lipped channel studs and conventional sheathing materials have long forestalled such improvements. Firstly, this study provides experimental evidence on the superior characteristics of the web-stiffened studs, developed specifically for load bearing steel-framed wall applications, and their ability to utilise sheathing restraints to achieve higher axial compression strengths. Secondly, it shows that the use of steel sheathing, either in isolation or together with gypsum plasterboards, significantly increases the strength of the web-stiffened stud. Thirdly, single plasterboard web-stiffened stud walls are found to be highly efficient due to the monolithic nature of the sheathing that leads to greater degrees of composite action between the studs and the sheathing. Finally, it presents a spring based analytical model capable of estimating the failure loads of sheathed web-stiffened studs conveniently. The model particularly focuses on the out-of-plane restraints provided by the sheathing, the contribution of which to the overall strength of the wall has traditionally been considered trivial, but is shown to be substantial in the case of web-stiffened studs. Using the improvements proposed, high capacity steel-framed load bearing walls can be developed with significant material and cost savings.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • steel
  • composite
  • gypsum