| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Ojala, Niko
Tampere University
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (24/24 displayed)
- 2021Comparison of various high-stress wear conditions and wear performance of martensitic steelscitations
- 2020Adaptation of Laboratory tests for the assessment of wear resistance of drill-bit inserts for rotarypercussive drilling of hard rockscitations
- 2019Comparison of laboratory wear test results with the in-service performance of cutting edges of loader bucketscitations
- 2019Comparison of various high-stress wear conditions and wear performance of martensitic steelscitations
- 2018Wear performance of quenched wear resistant steels in abrasive slurry erosioncitations
- 2018The role of niobium in improving toughness and corrosion resistance of high speed steel laser hardfacingscitations
- 2018High Speed Slurry-Pot Erosion Wear Testing of HVOF and HVAF Sprayed Hardmetal Coatings
- 2018Slurry and dry particle erosion wear properties of WC-10Co4Cr and Cr3C2-25NiCr hardmetal coatings deposited by HVOF and HVAF spray processes
- 2018Erosive-abrasive wear behavior of carbide-free bainitic and boron steels compared in simulated field conditionscitations
- 2018Comparison of impact-abrasive wear characteristics and performance of direct quenched (DQ) and direct quenched and partitioned (DQ&P) steelscitations
- 2017Effect of finish rolling and quench stop temperatures on impact-abrasive wear resistance of 0.35 % carbon direct-quenched steel
- 2017Comparison of laboratory wear test results with the in-service performance of cutting edges of loader bucketscitations
- 2017Cavitation erosion, slurry erosion and solid particle erosion performance of metal matrix composite (MMC) coatings sprayed with modern high velocity thermal spray processes
- 2017Application Oriented Wear Testing of Wear Resistant Steels in Mining Industry
- 2016Effects of composition and microstructure on the abrasive wear performance of quenched wear resistant steelscitations
- 2016Application oriented wear testing of wear resistant steels in mining industry
- 2016Comparison of laboratory wear test results with the in-service performance of cutting edges of loader buckets
- 2016Wear performance of quenched wear resistant steels in abrasive slurry erosioncitations
- 2016Erosive and abrasive wear performance of carbide free bainitic steels – comparison of field and laboratory experimentscitations
- 2016The role of niobium in improving toughness and corrosion resistance of high speed steel laser hardfacingscitations
- 2016The effects of microstructure on erosive-abrasive wear behavior of carbide free bainitic and boron steels
- 2016Processing and Wear Testing of Novel High-Hardness Wear-Resistant Steel
- 2014Effects of composition and microstructure on the abrasive wear performance of quenched wear resistant steelscitations
- 2014Versatile erosion wear testing with the high speed slurry-pot
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Erosive and abrasive wear performance of carbide free bainitic steels – comparison of field and laboratory experiments
Abstract
Carbide free bainitic (CFB) steels have been tested in two heat treated conditions and compared with currently used quenched and tempered (QT) steel in an industrial mining application subjected to erosive-abrasive wear. A conventional sliding abrasion and a new application oriented high-stress erosion wear tests were performed in laboratory. The results of the erosion and the field tests were compared. The microstructural changes were investigated by optical and scanning electron microscopy. The hardness and hardness profiles of the steels were measured. The results showed that in the laboratory tests, the abrasion and erosion wear rates of the CFB steels were 35 and 45 % lower respectively in comparison to the QT steel. In the field test, the mass losses of the CFB steels were about 80 % lower in comparison with the QT steel. The improved wear resistance of the CFB steel can be explained by its higher hardness and higher work hardening. The erosion wear test was able to simulate the work hardening effect and the wear mechanisms observed in the field test samples.