People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Kuutti, Juha
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (17/17 displayed)
- 2024Constraint effects on fracture toughness of ductile cast iron in the ductile regimecitations
- 2022Effect of Welding Direction and Bead Pattern in Alloy 52 / SA508 Repair Weld
- 2022Sensitivity of the Master Curve reference temperature T0 to the crack front curvaturecitations
- 2022Miniature C(T) Specimens-Pinhole Eccentricity and the Effect of Crack Opening Displacement Measurement Locationcitations
- 2021Evaluation of an Alloy 52 / Cladded Carbon Steel Repair Weld by Cold Metal Transfer
- 2021Online nonlinear ultrasound imaging of crack closure during thermal fatigue loadingcitations
- 2020Numerical assessment of the effects of microcrack interaction in AM componentscitations
- 2020A52M/SA502 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld:Evaluation of different techniques
- 2020A52M/SA502 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld
- 2020A52M/SA52 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld:Experimental Evaluation and Post-Weld Characterizationscitations
- 2020A52M/SA52 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld : Experimental Evaluation and Post-Weld Characterizationscitations
- 2018Comparison of ASME XI and BS7910 Allowable Surface Flaw Size Evaluation Procedures in Piping Componentscitations
- 2017Use of CTOD as crack driving force parameter for low-cycle thermal fatigue
- 2013Disposal canister shock absorber tests and analysis
- 2012A local remeshing procedure to simulate crack propagation in quasi-brittle materialscitations
- 2011Fracture Assessment of Reactor Circuit (FRAS):Advanced numerical fracture assessment methods
- 2010Simulation of ice crushing experiment using FE-model update technique
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Sensitivity of the Master Curve reference temperature T0 to the crack front curvature
Abstract
ASTM E1921 is a testing standard to determine the fracture toughness for ferritic steels in the ductile-to-brittle transition range. If the crack front curvature criterion in the standard is not fulfilled, the result is invalid, and more testing is required. However, previous investigations do not focus on quantifying the effect of curvature on Master Curve reference temperature, T0. The numerical and experimental analyses done in this study indicate that, for increasing crack front curvatures, the effect of curvature on T0 is marginal and the obtained T0 tends to provide a conservative estimate. Future investigations on large experimental data sets with the methods provided in this study would help to quantify the trends more in detail. The results contribute to the development of more cost-efficient testing methods and impact long-term operation of nuclear power plants.