Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Naib, Sameera

  • Google
  • 4
  • 7
  • 19

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2022Effects of fixture configurations and weld strength mismatch on J-integral calculation procedure for SE(B) specimens2citations
  • 2022Effects of fixture configurations and weld strength mismatch on J-integral calculation procedure for SE(B) specimens2citations
  • 2019Crack tip constraint analysis in welded joints with pronounced strength and toughness heterogeneity15citations
  • 2016Evaluation of a finite element model for SENT testing of welded connectionscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Gubeljak, Nenad
3 / 36 shared
De Waele, Wim
2 / 78 shared
Stefane, Primoz
2 / 5 shared
Hertelé, Stijn
4 / 45 shared
Waele, Wim De
2 / 30 shared
Štefane, Primož
1 / 3 shared
De Visschere, Matthijs
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2019
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Gubeljak, Nenad
  • De Waele, Wim
  • Stefane, Primoz
  • Hertelé, Stijn
  • Waele, Wim De
  • Štefane, Primož
  • De Visschere, Matthijs
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Crack tip constraint analysis in welded joints with pronounced strength and toughness heterogeneity

  • Naib, Sameera
  • Gubeljak, Nenad
  • Štefane, Primož
  • Hertelé, Stijn
  • Waele, Wim De
Abstract

Application of standardized fracture testing methods in heterogeneous welded joints might lead to overestimation or underestimation of fracture toughness and consequentially to inaccurate estimation of loading capacity of welded structure. Combining experimental testing and numerical modelling of double mismatched welded joints provided a view on influence of pronounced strength heterogeneity on fracture behaviour under monotonous loading. Investigated double mismatched welded joints had a fatigue crack located in one mismatched weld material region. The fatigue crack plane was perpendicular to the interface of two distinctive mismatched weld material regions, while the stable crack extension was estimated to be from one weld material region to other, crossing the interface. Single edge notched bend (SE(B)) specimens were used to investigate double mismatched welded joint fracture behaviour under high constraint conditions. Crack extension has been evaluated using normalization data reduction technique and crack driving force has been evaluated as specified in ASTM E1820 standard. Stress triaxiality has been implemented as a second fracture parameter, evaluating level of constraint. Obtained results show that combination of strength overmatched and undermatched weld material has a significant effect on the weld load capacity and stress triaxiality ahead of the crack tip. The latter leads to reduced or increased fracture toughness of the weld as the crack tip is closer to the fusion line between overmatched and undermatched weld material. Finally, computational simulations revealed how double mismatched weld configuration alters the stress field near the crack tip and corresponding values of J-integral. This implies that standard fracture test overestimate or underestimate fracture toughness of the double mismatched welded joint.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • crack
  • strength
  • fatigue
  • fracture toughness