Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Gallagher, E. A.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 8
  • 12

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Shear testing and failure modelling of calcium phosphate coated AZ31 magnesium alloys for orthopaedic applications12citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lemoine, Patrick
1 / 10 shared
Acheson, Jonathan
1 / 5 shared
Meenan, Brian
1 / 7 shared
Ward, Joanna
1 / 7 shared
Mckillop, S.
1 / 1 shared
Fitzgibbon, Brian
1 / 1 shared
Mcgarry, J. P.
1 / 9 shared
Boyd, Adrian
1 / 6 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lemoine, Patrick
  • Acheson, Jonathan
  • Meenan, Brian
  • Ward, Joanna
  • Mckillop, S.
  • Fitzgibbon, Brian
  • Mcgarry, J. P.
  • Boyd, Adrian
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Shear testing and failure modelling of calcium phosphate coated AZ31 magnesium alloys for orthopaedic applications

  • Lemoine, Patrick
  • Acheson, Jonathan
  • Gallagher, E. A.
  • Meenan, Brian
  • Ward, Joanna
  • Mckillop, S.
  • Fitzgibbon, Brian
  • Mcgarry, J. P.
  • Boyd, Adrian
Abstract

Magnesium orthopaedic fracture fixation devices can potentially provide significant clinical benefits, such as the elimination of secondary surgeries for device removal due to in-vivo resorption and reduced stress shielding due to reduced device stiffness. However, development, approval, and clinical adoption of magnesium devices has been hindered by the excessively high rates of in-vivo corrosion such that the structural integrity of the device can be catastrophically reduced before fracture healing occurs. Coating of devices with calcium phosphate coatings has been shown to significantly reduce corrosion rates, while enhancing osseointegration. However, the adhesion strength between the CaP coatings and magnesium substrates has not been previously investigated. Clinical insertion of fracture fixation devices such as intramedullary nails and k wires will impose significant shear loading on the coated surface of the implant. If the effective shear strength of the coating-device interface is not sufficiently high, the coating will be damaged and removed during device insertion. In the current study a bespoke experimental-computational approach is developed to provide a new understanding of the relationship between coating thickness, surface roughness, and effective shear strength of the CaP coating- Mg substrate interface. Nine test cases were created by adjusting either the deposition time (3 thickness values) or the surface treatment of the Mg alloy using SiC paper (3 roughness values) and double-lap shear testing was performed for these coating configurations. Strain development in the Mg substrates was monitored using strain gauges, and failure stress was determined for each configuration. Test results revealed that the effective shear strength of the coating-substrate interface is significantly higher for coatings on the rougher substrate surfaces when compared to those on smoother surfaces. Coating thickness was not found to significantly influence the effective shear strength over the range considered in this study (0.37–1.34 μm). Micro-scale finite element models of lap-shear tests were constructed using experimental profilometry data. Simulations of rough coating-substrate interfaces reveal that significant localised compression occurs at the coating-substrate interface in regions of large asperities. A novel cohesive zone formulation has been developed to simulate compression induced shear hardening, and the resultant simulations are found to accurately predict the significantly higher effective shear strength measured experimentally for rougher coatings compared to smoother Mg substrate surfaces.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • corrosion
  • simulation
  • Magnesium
  • magnesium alloy
  • Magnesium
  • strength
  • shear test
  • Calcium
  • wire
  • profilometry