Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Hugot, J.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 14

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2011Thermal cycling behavior of EBPVD TBC systems deposited on doped Pt-rich γ–γ′ bond coatings made by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS)14citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Estournès, Claude
1 / 141 shared
Monceau, Daniel
1 / 116 shared
Selezneff, Serge
1 / 15 shared
Oquab, Djar
1 / 15 shared
Boidot, Mathieu
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2011

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Estournès, Claude
  • Monceau, Daniel
  • Selezneff, Serge
  • Oquab, Djar
  • Boidot, Mathieu
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Thermal cycling behavior of EBPVD TBC systems deposited on doped Pt-rich γ–γ′ bond coatings made by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS)

  • Estournès, Claude
  • Monceau, Daniel
  • Selezneff, Serge
  • Oquab, Djar
  • Hugot, J.
  • Boidot, Mathieu
Abstract

In the last decade, an increasing interest was given to Pt-rich γ–γ′ alloys and coatings as they have shown good oxidation and corrosion properties. In our previous work, Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) has been proved to be a fast and efficient tool to fabricate coatings on superalloys including entire thermal barrier coating systems (TBC). In the present study, this technique was used to fabricate doped Pt-rich γ–γ′ bond coatings on AM1® superalloy substrate. The doping elements were reactive elements such as Hf, Y or Zr, Si and metallic additions of Ag. These samples were then coated by electron beam physical vapour deposition (EBPVD) with an yttria partially stabilized zirconia (YPSZ) thermal barrier coating. Such TBC systems with SPS Pt rich γ–γ′ bond coatings were compared to conventional TBC system composed of a β-(Ni,Pt)Al bond coating. Thermal cycling tests were performed during 1000-1 h cycles at 1100 °C under laboratory air. Spalling areas were monitored during this oxidation test. Most of the Pt rich γ–γ′ samples exhibited a better adherence of the ceramic layer than the β-samples. After the whole cyclic oxidation test, cross sections were prepared to characterize the thickness and the composition of the oxide scales by using scanning-electron microscopy. In particular, the influence of the doping elements on the oxide scale formation, the metal/oxide roughness, the TBC adherence and the remaining Al and Pt under the oxide scale were monitored. It was shown that RE-doping did not improve the oxidation kinetics of the studied Pt rich γ–γ′ bond coatings, nevertheless most of the compositions were superior to “classic” β-(Ni,Pt)Al bond coatings in terms of ceramic top coat adherence, due to lower rumpling kinetics and better oxide scale adherence of the γ–γ′-based systems.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • corrosion
  • reactive
  • electron microscopy
  • ceramic
  • sintering
  • superalloy