Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mogensen, Lisbeth

  • Google
  • 3
  • 9
  • 106

Aarhus University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2024Greenhouse gas emissions from bio-based growing media12citations
  • 2024Environmental performance of seaweed cultivation and use in different industries: A systematic review13citations
  • 2020Carbon footprint and land use of oat and faba bean protein concentrates using a life cycle assessment approach81citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Smith, Aidan Mark
1 / 3 shared
Knudsen, Marie Trydeman
3 / 3 shared
Ugilt Larsen, Søren
1 / 2 shared
Hashemi, Fatemeh
2 / 2 shared
Waqas, Muhammad Ahmed
1 / 1 shared
Sozer, Nesli
1 / 4 shared
Heusala, Hannele
1 / 1 shared
Hytönen, Eemeli
1 / 3 shared
Sinkko, T.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Smith, Aidan Mark
  • Knudsen, Marie Trydeman
  • Ugilt Larsen, Søren
  • Hashemi, Fatemeh
  • Waqas, Muhammad Ahmed
  • Sozer, Nesli
  • Heusala, Hannele
  • Hytönen, Eemeli
  • Sinkko, T.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Environmental performance of seaweed cultivation and use in different industries: A systematic review

  • Mogensen, Lisbeth
  • Waqas, Muhammad Ahmed
  • Knudsen, Marie Trydeman
  • Hashemi, Fatemeh
Abstract

<p>This study provides a comprehensive review of the environmental impacts associated with seaweed cultivation and utilization in various industries, focusing on life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. There is a remarkable disparity in the distribution of LCA studies. Asia produces 97 % of the global seaweed, but accounts for only 25 % of LCA research. In contrast, Europe, which produces only 0.8 % of the global seaweed production, is responsible for 70 % of the studies. Current cultivation practices result in low emissions of 0.02–0.08 CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalents (CO<sub>2</sub> eq)/kg of wet seaweed. Cultivation may yield climate benefits if biogenic carbon uptake and sequestration are considered. However, the stability of the stored carbon requires further research. Seaweeds have significant potential in various sectors, including bioenergy, food, feed, fertilizer, nanomaterials, construction, and cosmetics, supporting a circular bioeconomy. However, environmental hotspots include energy use for drying, fuel for transport, infrastructure production, and the processing phase. Various mitigation strategies include recirculation and utilization of by-products, extending infrastructure life, recycling infrastructure, using biodegradable materials, adopting renewable energy for drying, optimizing seaweed productivity and the content of valuable ingredients, refining system design for resource efficiency, developing biorefineries, and investigating alternative seaweed species. The diverse functional units used in LCAs limit comparisons between studies. Challenges in seaweed LCA research include the lack of standardized methodologies for varied production systems, cultivation impacts on local ecosystems, data limitations, and often comparisons of seaweed to terrestrial alternatives. Seaweed has the potential to promote sustainability in certain sectors. However, further research is needed to optimize seaweeds as a sustainable resource.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • phase
  • drying