| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Kirkelund, Gunvor Marie
Technical University of Denmark
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (23/23 displayed)
- 2024Mapping circular economy practices for steel, cement, glass, brick, insulation, and wood – A review for climate mitigation modelingcitations
- 2022Influence of ash type and mixing methods on workability and compressive strength when using Greenlandic MSWI fly ash as cement replacement in mortar
- 2022Effects of Chlorides and Sulphates on Heavy Metal Leaching from Mortar with Raw and Electrodialytically Treated MSWI Fly Ashcitations
- 2021Impact of electrodialytic remediation of MSWI fly ash on hydration and mechanical properties of blends with Portland cementcitations
- 2020Screening of untreated municipal solid waste incineration fly ash for use in cement-based materials: chemical and physical propertiescitations
- 2019Characterization of sewage sludge ash and its effect on moisture physics of mortarcitations
- 2019Electrodialytically treated MSWI fly ash use in clay bricks
- 2019Screening Untreated Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash for Use in Cement-Based Materials – Chemical and Physical Properties
- 2018Using polycarbobetaines for cu recovery from catholytes generated by electrodialytic treatment of sewage sludge ash
- 2017Colour, compressive strength and workability of mortars with an iron rich sewage sludge ashcitations
- 2016Wood ash used as partly sand and/or cement replacement in mortarcitations
- 2016Replacement of 5% of OPC by fly ash and APC residues from MSWI with electrodialytic pre-treatment
- 2015Ammonium citrate as enhancement for electrodialytic soil remediation and investigation of soil solution during the processcitations
- 2015Multivariate methods for evaluating the efficiency of electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from polluted harbour sedimentscitations
- 2014Electrodialytically treated MSWI APC residue as substitute for cement in mortar
- 2014The Aesthetical quality of SSA-containing mortar and concrete
- 2013Effect of pulse current on acidification and removal of Cu, Cd, and As during suspended electrodialytic soil remediationcitations
- 2012Electrodialytic remediation of suspended soil – Comparison of two different soil fractionscitations
- 2012Testing the possibility for reusing mswi bottom ash in Greenlandic road construction
- 2012Characterisation of MSWI bottom ash for potential use as subbase in Greenlandic road construction
- 2009Electrodialytic remediation of harbour sediment in suspension - Evaluation of effects induced by changes in stirring velocity and current density on heavy metal removal and pHcitations
- 2007Electrodialytic extraction of Cd and Cu from sediment from Sisimiut Harbour, Greenlandcitations
- 2005Acidification of Harbour sediment and removal of heavy metals induced by water splitting in electrodialytic remediation.citations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Mapping circular economy practices for steel, cement, glass, brick, insulation, and wood – A review for climate mitigation modeling
Abstract
Circular economy (CE) practices pave the way for the construction sector to become less material- and carbon-intensive. However, for CE quantification by climate mitigation models, one must first identify the CE practices along a product (or material) value chain. In this review, CE practices are mapped for the value chain of 6 construction materials to understand how these practices influence and can be considered in climate mitigation modelling. The main sub-categories of steel, cement, glass, clay-brick, insulation materials, and wood were used to identify which Rs are currently addressed at the lab and industrial scales: refuse, reduce, rethink, repair, reuse, remanufacture, refurbish, repurpose, recycle, and recover. The CE practices were reviewed using scientific repositories and grey literature, validated by European-wide stakeholders, and mapped across the life-cycle stages of the six materials – extraction, manufacturing, use, and end-of-life (EoL). The mapping was limited to the manufacturing and EoL stages because materials could be identified at these stages (the extraction phase pertains to resources, and the use phase to a product, for example, buildings). All reviewed CE practices identified at the industrial scale were quantified at the European level. For example, EoL reinforcement steel is 1–11 % reused and 70–95 % recycled; manufacturing CEM I is up to 60 % reduced; remanufacturing flat glass is 26 % remanufactured while less than 5 % EoL flat glass is recycled. A major barrier to closed-loop recycling is the need for sorting and separation technologies. Open-loop recycling synergies are found at the industrial scale between, for example, flat glass and glass wool value chains. Climate mitigation models are proposed to be augmented to include these practices requiring an explicit link between building use and the other construction materials' value chain stages.