Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Rückert, Ulrike

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2025Real-time quality prediction and local adjustment of friction with digital twin in sheet metal forming7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ihlenfeldt, Steffen
1 / 15 shared
Klingel, Lars
1 / 1 shared
Penter, Lars
1 / 8 shared
Verl, Alexander
1 / 2 shared
Link, Patrick
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2025

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ihlenfeldt, Steffen
  • Klingel, Lars
  • Penter, Lars
  • Verl, Alexander
  • Link, Patrick
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Real-time quality prediction and local adjustment of friction with digital twin in sheet metal forming

  • Ihlenfeldt, Steffen
  • Klingel, Lars
  • Rückert, Ulrike
  • Penter, Lars
  • Verl, Alexander
  • Link, Patrick
Abstract

<p>In sheet metal forming, the quality of a formed part is strongly influenced by the local lubrication conditions on the blank. Fluctuations in lubrication distribution can cause failures such as excessive thinning and cracks. Predicting these failures in real-time for the entire part is still a very challenging task. Machine learning (ML) based digital twins and advanced computing power offer new ways to analyze manufacturing processes inline in the shortest possible time. This study presents a digital twin for simulating a deep drawing process that incorporates an advanced ML model and optimization algorithm. Convolutional neural networks with RES-SE-U-Net architecture, were used to capture the full friction conditions on the blank. The ML model was trained with data from a calibrated finite element model. The ML model establishes a correlation between the local friction conditions across the blank and the quality of the drawn part. It accurately predicts the geometry and thinning of the formed part in real-time by assessing the friction conditions on the blank. A particle swarm optimization algorithm incorporates the ML model and provides tailored recommendations for adjusting local friction conditions to promptly correct detected quality deviations with minimal amount of additional lubricant. Experiments show that the ML model deployed on an industrial control system can predict part quality in real-time and recommend adjustments in case of quality deviation in 1.6 s. The error between prediction and ground truth is on average 0.16 mm for geometric accuracy and 0.02 % for thinning.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • crack
  • drawing
  • machine learning