Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Aihkisalo, Tommi

  • Google
  • 3
  • 6
  • 69

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2024Process monitoring by deep neural networks in directed energy deposition : CNN-based detection, segmentation, and statistical analysis of melt pools23citations
  • 2024Process monitoring by deep neural networks in directed energy deposition23citations
  • 2024Process monitoring by deep neural networks in directed energy deposition:CNN-based detection, segmentation, and statistical analysis of melt pools23citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Revuelta, Alejandro
3 / 17 shared
Ituarte, Iñigo Flores
3 / 13 shared
Wiikinkoski, Olli
3 / 3 shared
Asadi, Reza
3 / 4 shared
Queguineur, Antoine
3 / 11 shared
Mokhtarian, Hossein
3 / 12 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Revuelta, Alejandro
  • Ituarte, Iñigo Flores
  • Wiikinkoski, Olli
  • Asadi, Reza
  • Queguineur, Antoine
  • Mokhtarian, Hossein
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Process monitoring by deep neural networks in directed energy deposition

  • Aihkisalo, Tommi
  • Revuelta, Alejandro
  • Ituarte, Iñigo Flores
  • Wiikinkoski, Olli
  • Asadi, Reza
  • Queguineur, Antoine
  • Mokhtarian, Hossein
Abstract

<p>The complex interaction between laser and material in Laser Wire Direct Energy Deposition (LW-DED) Additive Manufacturing (AM) benefits from process monitoring methods to ensure process stability and final part quality. Understanding the relationship between process parameters and melt pool geometrical characteristics can be used to effectively monitor and in-process control the process, as the melt pool geometrical characteristics serve as crucial indicators of process stability and quality. This study presents a novel in-situ monitoring approach for LW-DED, utilizing process images for melt pool segmentation, melt pool geometrical characteristics estimation, process stability assessment, and bead geometry prediction. The segmentation of melt pool objects was successfully accomplished using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)-based models, enabling the prediction of essential parameters such as melt pool area, height, width, center of area, and the center point of the bounding box enclosing the melt pool. Multiple models were compared regarding the accuracy and processing speed using a controlled central composite design and random experiments. We used an Inconel alloy 625 wire and two distinct substrate materials for deposition, a coaxial laser welding head with a 3 kW fiber laser, and an off-axis welding camera for monitoring. Among the CNN architectures evaluated, YOLOv8l demonstrated superior accuracy with mean Average Precision (mAP) values of 0.925 and 0.853 for Stainless Steel (SS) and low carbon steel (S355) substrates, respectively. Additionally, YOLOv8s exhibited a notable processing speed of over 114 frames per second, which indicates its suitability for real-time process control. Furthermore, the results indicate a significant correlation between process parameters and melt pool geometry variables. Notably, a clear correlation was established between melt pool characteristics and bead geometries obtained through microscopic examinations, including penetration depth and heat-affected zone. The analysis revealed a significant correlation for the bead area and width parameters. In relation to the bead height, while the correlation exhibited a lower magnitude compared to bead area and width, it remained responsive. In addition, the tensor masks derived from the developed models have proven to be highly effective in accurately predicting bead geometries. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of YOLO-based algorithms for detecting and segmenting the melt pool. Statistical analysis confirms the significance of stabilized process data and the accuracy of melt pool geometric models. We demonstrate that integrating advanced monitoring and control techniques using artificial intelligence methods like CNN can facilitate process stability and quality control.</p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • Carbon
  • stainless steel
  • experiment
  • melt
  • composite
  • random
  • wire
  • directed energy deposition