Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Donato, Gustavo Henrique Bolognesi

  • Google
  • 14
  • 21
  • 75

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (14/14 displayed)

  • 2018Validity limits of the one-parameter elastic-plastic fracture mechanics (J-integral) considering SE(B), C(T) and clamped SE(T) specimens2citations
  • 2018Ductile fracture of advanced pipeline steels: study of stress states and energies in dynamic impact specimens - CVN and DWTT7citations
  • 2018Texture Analysis for Crack Detection in Fracture Mechanics1citations
  • 2018Effects of manufacturing plastic prestrains found on calendered and UOE pipes and pressure vessels on structural integrity assessments regarding fatigue crack growth and LBB2citations
  • 2016Reverse strain-induced martensitic transformation of the ferrite to austenite in duplex stainless steels6citations
  • 2015Influence of loading frequency on the fatigue behaviour of coir fibre reinforced PP composite23citations
  • 2014Applicability of Precracked Charpy Specimens for Determining Fatigue Crack Growth and J-R Properties: Experiments and Assessment of K and J Dominancecitations
  • 2012Effects of Plastic Deformation on Fatigue Life of Superduplex Steel Tube Umbilical1citations
  • 2012Applicability of SE(T) and SE(B) Fracture Specimens in Crack Growth Measurements of Pipeline Girth Welds4citations
  • 2011Fatigue Life Estimation of Welded Joints Including the Effects of Crack Closure Phenomena1citations
  • 2009Effects of Weld Strength Mismatch on Estimation Procedures for J Fracture Parameter Using Clamped SE(T) Specimenscitations
  • 2009Effects of weld strength mismatch on J and CTOD estimation procedure for SE(B) specimens26citations
  • 2008A FAD-Based Procedure for Defect Assessments of Welded Structures Including Effects of Weld Strength Mismatch: Micromechanics Approach and Application to Pipeline Girth Weldscitations
  • 2007Effects of Weld Strength Mismatch on Estimation Procedures for J and CTOD Fracture Parameters Using SE(B) Specimens2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Moreira, Felipe Cavalheiro
1 / 1 shared
Moço, Rodrygo Figueiredo
3 / 3 shared
Pereira, Letícia Dos Santos
1 / 1 shared
Rodrigues, Paulo S.
1 / 1 shared
Fardo, Fernando A.
1 / 1 shared
Cavalcante, Fábio Gonçalves
1 / 1 shared
Marangoni, Julia
1 / 1 shared
Júnior, Arnaldo Forgas
1 / 1 shared
Otubo, Jorge
1 / 4 shared
Moraes, Dijan Vinicius Osti De
1 / 1 shared
Antunes, Marcela
1 / 1 shared
Bettini, Sílvia
1 / 1 shared
Merlo, Tatiane Rossi
1 / 1 shared
Ruggieri, Claudio
6 / 12 shared
Savioli, Rafael
1 / 3 shared
Filho, Antonio P. Nascimento
1 / 1 shared
Lemos, Carlos Alberto Duarte De
1 / 1 shared
Silva, Neilon
1 / 1 shared
Parise, Luís F. S.
1 / 1 shared
Mathias, Leonardo L. S.
1 / 1 shared
Godefroid, Leonardo
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2018
2016
2015
2014
2012
2011
2009
2008
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Moreira, Felipe Cavalheiro
  • Moço, Rodrygo Figueiredo
  • Pereira, Letícia Dos Santos
  • Rodrigues, Paulo S.
  • Fardo, Fernando A.
  • Cavalcante, Fábio Gonçalves
  • Marangoni, Julia
  • Júnior, Arnaldo Forgas
  • Otubo, Jorge
  • Moraes, Dijan Vinicius Osti De
  • Antunes, Marcela
  • Bettini, Sílvia
  • Merlo, Tatiane Rossi
  • Ruggieri, Claudio
  • Savioli, Rafael
  • Filho, Antonio P. Nascimento
  • Lemos, Carlos Alberto Duarte De
  • Silva, Neilon
  • Parise, Luís F. S.
  • Mathias, Leonardo L. S.
  • Godefroid, Leonardo
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Ductile fracture of advanced pipeline steels: study of stress states and energies in dynamic impact specimens - CVN and DWTT

  • Donato, Gustavo Henrique Bolognesi
  • Moço, Rodrygo Figueiredo
  • Pereira, Letícia Dos Santos
Abstract

he development of robust protocols for assessing the structural integrity of gas pipelines is of paramount relevance, since failures can lead to financial and human losses. In this scenario, the material’s ability to slow down the propagation of a running crack (crack arrest) becomes a design requirement. Several empirical models and criteria, calibrated by real pipeline burst tests, have been developed, being the Battele Two Curve Method (BTCM) one example of technique widely employed during decades. With the evolution of steels, there was a significant increase of ductility and toughness, in a way that such semi-empirical models usually based on the energy absorbed in the Charpy impact test (ISO 148-1, ASTM E-23) began to present unsatisfactory predictions. This may be explained by the fact that in current high-ductility and high-toughness materials (e.g.: API-5L X65, X80, X100), the dominant mechanism of fracture propagation is plastic collapse. Consequently, the energies involved in deforming and fracturing a laboratory specimen are remarkably altered and transferability to pipelines by means of the aforementioned models can be lost. Therefore, for a better phenomenological comprehension of the ductile fracture process under such circumstances, this work investigates Charpy and DWTT (ASTM E-436) dynamic tests assessing stress fields and respective energies involved in deformation and fracture. It is of great interest to evaluate the energy associated to steady state ductile fracture and thus try to characterize the energy available to slow down an ongoing fracture. Pipelines are references for the developments and support assumptions and some conclusions. Based on these golas, numerical analyses including damage models (XFEM and GTN) were implemented, including parameters’ calibration and sensitivity analyses. The methodology closely reproduced available experimental results. Besides that, stress fields and energies could be quantified for the studied geometries and such analyses indicated the potential and limitations of Charpy and DWTT specimens to characterize the energies required to describe steady state ductile crack propagation and crack arrestability. Results support further developments related to pipeline integrity assessments.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • crack
  • steel
  • impact test
  • ductility