People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Borba, Márcia
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (20/20 displayed)
- 2024A Comprehensive Review of the Multifaceted Characterisation Approaches of Dental Ceramics
- 2024Influence of Different Surface Finishing Protocols on the Wear Behavior of Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramics
- 2023Influence of piston material on the fatigue behavior of a glass-ceramiccitations
- 2023Fatigue resistance of polymeric restorative materials: effect of supporting substrate
- 2023Optimization of Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic Crowns: Finish Line, Scanning, and Processing Methodscitations
- 2020Effect of a new irrigant solution containing glycolic acid on smear layer removal and chemical/mechanical properties of dentincitations
- 2019Effect of supporting substrate on the failure behavior of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network materialcitations
- 2019Effect of supporting substrate on the failure behavior of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network materialcitations
- 2019Fatigue Behavior of Crystalline-Reinforced Glass-Ceramicscitations
- 2018Effect of screw-access hole and mechanical cycling on fracture load of 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesescitations
- 2018Precision of different fatigue methods for predicting glass-ceramic failurecitations
- 2018Precision of different fatigue methods for predicting glass-ceramic failurecitations
- 2018How does the piston material affect the in vitro mechanical behavior of dental ceramics?citations
- 2018How does the piston material affect the in vitro mechanical behavior of dental ceramics?citations
- 2017Influence of surface finishing on fracture load and failure mode of glass ceramic crownscitations
- 2016Effect of different aging methods on the mechanical behavior of multi-layered ceramic structurescitations
- 2016Effect of different aging methods on the mechanical behavior of multi-layered ceramic structurescitations
- 2014Effect of the infrastructure material on the failure behavior of prosthetic crownscitations
- 2011Flexural strength and failure modes of layered ceramic structurescitations
- 2011Flexural strength and failure modes of layered ceramic structurescitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
How does the piston material affect the in vitro mechanical behavior of dental ceramics?
Abstract
<p>Statement of problem: Variables involving the indication, manufacturing, and clinical use of ceramic restorations make the standardization of in vitro studies a challenge and raise questions as to the clinical validity of the resulting data. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of piston material on the fracture behavior of ceramics tested under compressive load. </p><p>Material and methods: Two ceramics were evaluated: a lithium disilicate–based glass-ceramic (D) and a feldspathic porcelain (P). Plate-shaped ceramic specimens (1.5-mm thick) were adhesively cemented onto a dentin analog substrate. The specimens from each ceramic were divided into 4 groups according to the piston material (n=20): metal (M) (stainless steel), composite resin (R) (NEMA-G10, fiber-reinforced epoxy resin), ceramic (C) (lithium disilicate–based glass-ceramic), and human tooth (T) (canine). A gradual compressive load (0.5 mm/min) was applied to the center of the specimen with a universal testing machine. The test was performed in 37°C distilled water, and the initial crack was detected by using an acoustic system. The fracture load values (N) were statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α=.05). A finite element analysis (FEA) was also performed. </p><p>Results: Piston material had no influence on fracture load and failure mode of ceramic D. Ceramic P showed higher fracture load values when loaded with the composite resin piston. Ceramic P showed more combined failures (cone crack and radial crack) than D. The FEA showed a distinct stress distribution for R piston on P. Pistons C and T resulted in similar stress distribution, fracture load, and failure mode for both ceramics. </p><p>Conclusions: The effect of piston material on the ceramic fracture behavior depends on the ceramic being evaluated.</p>