People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Leotoing, Lionel
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Rennes
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (32/32 displayed)
- 2024Finite element analysis of the mechanical performance of self-expanding endovascular stents made with new nickel-free superelastic β-titanium alloyscitations
- 2024Finite element analysis of a low modulus Ti-20Zr-3Mo-3Sn alloy designed to reduce the stress shielding effect of a hip prosthesiscitations
- 2024Finite element analysis of a low modulus Ti-20Zr-3Mo-3Sn alloy designed to reduce the stress shielding effect of a hip prosthesiscitations
- 2024Investigations on the temperature and strain rate dependent behavior of a reinforced thermoplastic: application in hot incremental forming
- 2024Identification of thermo-viscoplastic behavior for AA6061 under in-plane biaxial loadingscitations
- 2023Thermo-visco mechanical behavior of glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic compositecitations
- 2023Instrumented indentation for determining stress and strain levels of prestrained DC01 sheetscitations
- 2022Effect of temperature and strain rate on the mechanical behavior of discontinuous glass fibre reinforced thermoplastic composite
- 2022Relevant material characterization for load prediction in incremental formingcitations
- 2021Effect of microstructure on the formability of Ti21S alloycitations
- 2020Numerical investigation on cruciform composite shape for the biaxial characterization test
- 2020Effect of temperature and strain rate on the plastic anisotropic behavior characterized by a single biaxial tensile testcitations
- 2019Incremental forming of Titanium T40 sheet: experimental and numerical investigations
- 2018Numerical investigation on cruciform composite shape for the biaxial characterization test
- 2016Identification of strain rate-dependent mechanical behaviour of DP600 under in-plane biaxial loadingscitations
- 2016Strain Rate Dependent Hardening of DP600 Sheet Metal for Large Strains Under In-plane Biaxial Loadingscitations
- 2015Potential of the Cross Biaxial Test for Anisotropy Characterization Based on Heterogeneous Strain Fieldcitations
- 2014Calibration of anisotropic yield criterion with conventional tests or biaxial testcitations
- 2014Temperature and strain rate influence on AA5086 Forming Limit Curves: experimental results and discussion on the validity of the M-K modelcitations
- 2014Influence of temperature and strain rate on the formability of aluminium alloys: Comparison between experimental and predictive results
- 2013Characterization of sheet metal plastic anisotropy by cross biaxial tensile test
- 2013Calibration of material parameters of anisotropic yield criterion with conventional tests and biaxial testcitations
- 2013A cruciform shape to study the influence of strain paths on forming limit curvescitations
- 2011An in-plane tensile test for rheological and formability identification : comparison between experimental and numerical FLC
- 2011A comparative study of different necking criteria for numerical and experimental prediction of FLCscitations
- 2010A biaxial test for rheological and formability identificationcitations
- 2010Experimental and numerical study on effect of forming rate on AA5086 sheet formabilitycitations
- 2010A methodology for evaluating sheet formability combining the tensile test with the M-K modelcitations
- 2010Development of an in-plane biaxial test for forming limit curve (FLC) characterization of metallic sheetscitations
- 2009Theoretical and numerical study of strain rate influence on AA5083 formabilitycitations
- 2008Theoretical and numerical study of strain rate sensitivity on formability of sheet metal
- 2008Optimization of biaxial tensile specimen shape from numerical investigations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
conferencepaper
Effect of temperature and strain rate on the plastic anisotropic behavior characterized by a single biaxial tensile test
Abstract
The heterogeneous strain field measured by digital image correlation in the central gauge area of a cruciform specimen permits to characterize the plastic anisotropic behavior of metallic sheets with a unique specimen [1]. Indeed, minor and major strains measured along several paths show a wide range of strain states, from uniaxial to equi-biaxial stress state. Thanks to the recording of forces along the two loading directions and to the strain field measurement, an identification of complex anisotropic yield criteria (like Bron and Besson criterion) is possible by inverse procedure. Then, a unique test is sufficient to evaluate the anisotropic behavior of the sheet. The aim of this work is to evaluate the effect of temperature and strain rate on the anisotropic behavior of AA6061 sheet. For this purpose, a biaxial device equipped with four hydraulic cylinders and accumulators (applied speed until 200mm/s), and with an air flow generator (applied temperature up to 160°C) is used to perform in-plane biaxial tensile tests for different conditions of strain rate and temperature. Numerical simulations of the equi-biaxial tensile test are then performed for these different experimental conditions. The numerical simulations are based on a FE model of the cruciform specimen including temperature and strain rate hardening dependencies while the Bron and Besson yield criterion has been calibrated only at room temperature and under quasi-static conditions. Finally, agreement between experimental and numerical evolutions of principal strains and strain paths ratios along three specific profiles is compared and the relevance of using only one experimental condition (room temperature and quasi-static strain rate) to calibrate the yield criterion is discussed. © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 23rd International Conference on Material Forming.