Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Maagard, J.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2011N-V Interaction in Reinforced Concrete Elements without Stirrups4citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hansen, S.
1 / 7 shared
Hoang, Linh Cao
1 / 31 shared
Madsen, M. B.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2011

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hansen, S.
  • Hoang, Linh Cao
  • Madsen, M. B.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

N-V Interaction in Reinforced Concrete Elements without Stirrups

  • Hansen, S.
  • Maagard, J.
  • Hoang, Linh Cao
  • Madsen, M. B.
Abstract

This paper presents a recently conducted series of shear tests on reinforced concrete elements without stirrups subjected to normal forces. The main varying parameter is the level of axial compression. The tests include axial compression stresses ranging from 0 up to 85% of the concrete compression strength. Shear tests with such high level of axial compression have to the knowledge of the authors not been reported in the literature. Comparison of the test results with the design formula in the Eurocode 2 (EC2) reveals, that further enhancement beyond the upper limit imposed by the code can be obtained. The paper also demonstrates how the upper limit can be calculated by use of a plasticity based approach for shear strength prediction. The upper limit is established by considering two types of shear failure mode. It is shown that the upper limit determined in this way is in better agreement with the experimental observations. On the average - and when including existing test series with small axial compression levels - both methods considered lead to acceptable agreement with test results. It is argued, that the plasticity based method is preferable as it is based on a theoretical model and therefore is easier to extend to cases not covered by tests.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • shear test
  • plasticity