Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ji, Ze

  • Google
  • 3
  • 10
  • 40

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2021Automatised quality assessment in additive layer manufacturing using layer-by-layer surface measurements and deep learning9citations
  • 2020Machine Learning-enabled feedback loops for metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing31citations
  • 2020Machine Learning-enabled feedback loops for metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturingcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Liu, Chao
2 / 2 shared
Roux, Léopold Le
2 / 2 shared
Kerfriden, Pierre
3 / 16 shared
Bigot, Samuel
3 / 8 shared
Feyer, Felix
1 / 2 shared
Gage, Daniel
1 / 2 shared
Körner, Carolin
1 / 199 shared
Lacan, Franck
2 / 6 shared
Liu, Chao
1 / 8 shared
Le Roux, Léopold
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Liu, Chao
  • Roux, Léopold Le
  • Kerfriden, Pierre
  • Bigot, Samuel
  • Feyer, Felix
  • Gage, Daniel
  • Körner, Carolin
  • Lacan, Franck
  • Liu, Chao
  • Le Roux, Léopold
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Automatised quality assessment in additive layer manufacturing using layer-by-layer surface measurements and deep learning

  • Liu, Chao
  • Roux, Léopold Le
  • Kerfriden, Pierre
  • Ji, Ze
  • Bigot, Samuel
  • Feyer, Felix
  • Gage, Daniel
  • Körner, Carolin
Abstract

<p>Additive manufacturing (AM) has gained high research interests in the past but comes with some drawbacks, such as the difficulty to do in-situ quality monitoring. In this paper, deep learning is used on electron-optical images taken during the Electron Beam Melting (EBM) process to classify the quality of AM layers to achieve automatized quality assessment. A comparative study of several mainstream Convolutional Neural Networks to classify the images has been conducted. The classification accuracy is up to 95 %, which demonstrates the great potential to support in-process layer quality control of EBM.And the error analysis has shown that some human misclassification were correctly classified by the Convolutional Neural Networks.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • electron beam melting
  • surface measurement