Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Theodorakeas, Panagiotis

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 11

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017Theoretical assessment of different ultrasonic configurations for defects detection in composite components11citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Asfis, Georgios
1 / 1 shared
Salonitis, Konstantinos
1 / 22 shared
Cheilakou, Eleni
1 / 1 shared
Avdelidis, Nicolas
1 / 1 shared
Tzitzilonis, Vasileios
1 / 1 shared
Kappatos, Vassilis
1 / 16 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Asfis, Georgios
  • Salonitis, Konstantinos
  • Cheilakou, Eleni
  • Avdelidis, Nicolas
  • Tzitzilonis, Vasileios
  • Kappatos, Vassilis
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Theoretical assessment of different ultrasonic configurations for defects detection in composite components

  • Asfis, Georgios
  • Theodorakeas, Panagiotis
  • Salonitis, Konstantinos
  • Cheilakou, Eleni
  • Avdelidis, Nicolas
  • Tzitzilonis, Vasileios
  • Kappatos, Vassilis
Abstract

It is well known that structures’ safety is crucial and of great importance. Part of their maintenance procedure is structural inspection, which is currently performed with the aid of Non Destructive Testing (NDT) techniques, aiming to detect structural defects in damaged or flawed components and prevent a catastrophic failure by substituting or repairing them. The objective of this work is the theoretical assessment of different ultrasonic configurations that could maximize delamination defect detection in composite components. Modeling study was performed using simulationsoftware, where physical models representative of laminated Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) composites, consisting of a variety of artificial delamination defect modes (different sizes and depth), were numerically tested. Different ultrasonic configurations on both the positioning and the firing of the probe’s elements including Phased Array (PA) delay timings and sampled array techniques were investigated and are presented in this paper. The potential of Full Matrix Capture (FMC) data acquisition technique, modelled here, along with the post processing Total Focusing Method (TFM) reconstruction approach is also assessed in terms of their ability to enhance defect detectability and visualization.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • composite
  • defect
  • ultrasonic