Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bau, S.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 56

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2010A TEM-based method as an alternative to the BET method for measuring off-line the specific surface area of nanoaerosols56citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Thomas, D.
1 / 5 shared
Gensdarmes, Francois
1 / 5 shared
Rastoix, O.
1 / 1 shared
Witschger, O.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Thomas, D.
  • Gensdarmes, Francois
  • Rastoix, O.
  • Witschger, O.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

A TEM-based method as an alternative to the BET method for measuring off-line the specific surface area of nanoaerosols

  • Thomas, D.
  • Gensdarmes, Francois
  • Rastoix, O.
  • Bau, S.
  • Witschger, O.
Abstract

At the present time, no stabilised method exists allowing an estimation of the specific surface area for airborne nanostructured particles (nanoaerosols). Recent toxicological studies have, however, revealed biological effects linked to the surface area of these particles. Only the BET method, which can determine the specific mass surface area of a powder, constitutes a reference both in toxicology and in the materials domain. However, this technique is not applicable to nanostructured aerosols given the mass quantities of particles required (between approximately some mg to hundreds of mg taking into account the limit of quantification of existing BET instruments). To characterise the specific surface area of airborne nanostructured particles, a method based on analysing transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images is proposed. This has recourse in particular to previous work carried out in the area of nanoparticles originating from combustion (soot), and takes into account structural parameters of nanostructured particles including the number distribution of primary particles, their overlap coefficient and the fractal dimension of agglomerates and aggregates. The approach proposed in this work was applied to five commercially-available nanostructured powders of differing natures (SiO2, ZrO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and Fe3O4). This first involved their prior analysis by the BET method and then being placed in suspension in aerosol form using a vortex-type shaker system. The procedure to calculate the specific surface area using image analysis was then applied to the sampled aerosols and compared to the BET measurements. The experimental results obtained on the five nanostructured powders cover a range of specific surface areas from 20 to 200 m2/g, the primary particles having mean diameters varying from 7 to 47 nm. Close agreement was observed between the two approaches which, taking into account measurement uncertainties, are statistically equivalent at significance level α = 0.05.

Topics
  • nanoparticle
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • combustion
  • transmission electron microscopy
  • BET measurement