People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Kontogeorgis, Georgios M.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (18/18 displayed)
- 2024Composition-dependence of relative static permittivity in ePPC-SAFT for mixed-solvent alkali halidescitations
- 2024Investigation of the Alcohols and Water Hydrogen Bonding Structure via Monomer Fraction Studiescitations
- 2024The Connection between the Debye and Güntelberg Charging Processes and the Importance of Relative Permittivity: The Ionic Cloud Charging Processcitations
- 2023On the estimation of equivalent conductivity of electrolyte solutions; The effect of relative static permittivity and viscositycitations
- 2023Comparisons of equation of state models for electrolytes: e-CPA and e-PPC-SAFTcitations
- 2023Comparison of models for the relative static permittivity with the e-CPA equation of statecitations
- 2023How to account for the concentration dependency of relative permittivity in the Debye–Hückel and Born equationscitations
- 2023Extension of the eSAFT-VR Mie Equation of State from aqueous to non-aqueous electrolyte solutionscitations
- 2022Importance of the Relative Static Permittivity in electrolyte SAFT-VR Mie Equations of Statecitations
- 2022The true Hückel equation for electrolyte solutions and its relation with the Born termcitations
- 2022Self-stratification studies in waterborne epoxy-silicone systemscitations
- 2022Self-stratification studies in waterborne epoxy-silicone systemscitations
- 2018A Multi-stage and Multi-level Computer Aided Framework for Sustainable Process Intensificationcitations
- 2013Modeling of Dielectric Properties of Aqueous Salt Solutions with an Equation of Statecitations
- 2013Modeling of dielectric properties of complex fluids with an equation of statecitations
- 2012Comparison of the Debye–Hückel and the Mean Spherical Approximation Theories for Electrolyte Solutionscitations
- 2007Adhesion between coating layers based on epoxy and siliconecitations
- 2004Chemical Product Design: A new challenge of applied thermodynamicscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Self-stratification studies in waterborne epoxy-silicone systems
Abstract
<p>Waterborneepoxy‑silicone coating formulations are prepared by combining selectedingredients in optimum quantities to produce ~250–275 μm films (dry filmthickness, DFT) applied on polyester, sandblasted steel, smooth steel,acrylic, polypropyleneand aluminum substrates. The self-stratification of the appliedcoatings is then evaluated using Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy– Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR–ATR) and Scanning ElectronMicroscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive X-Ray (EDX) analysis. Thedifference in the absorption spectra of the top and bottom surfaces ofthese films as well as a significant difference in topography seen fromthe SEM images and elemental mapping through an EDX analysis of thecross-section has confirmed the occurrence of stratification onpolyester substrate. The observed stratification results aresubsequently compared with a theoretical model where the primarymechanism driving the separation is assumed to be the surface freeenergy difference of the resins and their respective wetting of thesubstrate. The influence of using two different theories, Wu's HarmonicMean Method and Owens-Wendt Method for the interfacial surface tensionsand the solid surface free energy computations, on the predictions fromthis model is also tested. The theoretical predictions support theobserved results for most cases of the formulated waterborne systems;except for the case of sandblasted steel, the observed results do notmatch the predictions. The possible reasons for the difference inbetween the prediction and observation for this specific case has alsobeen elucidated.</p>