Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Papaj, Ewa A.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 41

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2014Effect of hardener variation on protective properties of polyurethane coating41citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mills, Douglas J.
1 / 15 shared
Jamali, Sina S.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mills, Douglas J.
  • Jamali, Sina S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effect of hardener variation on protective properties of polyurethane coating

  • Mills, Douglas J.
  • Jamali, Sina S.
  • Papaj, Ewa A.
Abstract

Polyurethane is a two component coating commonly used in high performance anti-corrosion protectivesystems. The two components are normally a polyacrylic resin and a polyisocyanate hardener. The mainpurpose of this study was to investigate the effect of hardener variation on the protective properties ofpolyurethane coating. Apart from theoretical interest, there is a practical interest to this work because, forvarious reasons, in the field the correct ratio of base to hardener is not always followed. Another aim was todiscover changes in mechanical properties such as abrasion and adhesion, and also find out differences inthe chemical structure and crosslink density. Hence unpigmented polyurethane resin with hardener:baseratios of 0.75:1, 1:1 and 1.5:1 were applied on mild steel panels. Detached coatings were obtained fromcasting on polypropylene sheets. To evaluate anticorrosive properties attached coatings were immersedin 3% sodium chloride for 1008 h and monitored using EIS and DC resistance tests. Abrasion resistance wasmeasured by the Taber test. Wet adhesion was studied by immersing in 3% NaCl for 5 and 7 days, and thenusing the pull-off method. The detached coatings were used to evaluate chemical structure using FTIRspectroscopy, and to look at the physico-mechanical properties using a DMTA test. Electrochemical resultsshowed that polyurethane coatings with a higher hardener ratio have a higher electrical (ionic) resistance.This was attributed to a more tightly cross-linked structure. In addition, polyurethane coatings with ahigher hardener ratio have a better abrasion resistance. The lowest adhesion was given by the coating withthe stoichiometric hardener ratio. The work raised some interesting questions on the relation betweenadhesion and corrosion resistance. The FTIR results indicated that polyurethane coatings with the lowerhardener ratio have fewer urethane groups than coatings with the higher hardener ratio. Furthermoreresults confirmed that the Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and DC resistance are good methodsto investigate how the protection ability of the coatings depends on both the nature of the coating andon time.

Topics
  • density
  • corrosion
  • steel
  • Sodium
  • electrochemical-induced impedance spectroscopy
  • resin