Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Schalnat, Joanna

  • Google
  • 2
  • 8
  • 30

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2021Long-term stiffness prediction of particle filled polymers by dynamic mechanical analysis : frequency sweep versus creep method9citations
  • 2020Influencing parameters on measurement accuracy in dynamic mechanical analysis of thermoplastic polymers and their composites21citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
De Clerck, Karen
2 / 36 shared
Van Paepegem, Wim
2 / 489 shared
Clerck, Karen De
2 / 36 shared
Daelemans, Lode
2 / 56 shared
Baere, Ives De
2 / 20 shared
De Baere, Ives
2 / 49 shared
Gomez, David Garoz
1 / 3 shared
Garoz Gómez, David
1 / 13 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • De Clerck, Karen
  • Van Paepegem, Wim
  • Clerck, Karen De
  • Daelemans, Lode
  • Baere, Ives De
  • De Baere, Ives
  • Gomez, David Garoz
  • Garoz Gómez, David
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Long-term stiffness prediction of particle filled polymers by dynamic mechanical analysis : frequency sweep versus creep method

  • De Clerck, Karen
  • Van Paepegem, Wim
  • Clerck, Karen De
  • Daelemans, Lode
  • Schalnat, Joanna
  • Baere, Ives De
  • De Baere, Ives
Abstract

The long-term service life of polymers can be estimated with much shorter experiments by applying the time temperature superposition principle (TTS). In this approach, data is obtained at different temperatures, usually through a stepped isothermal method (SIM) on the same sample. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) instruments offer two different measurement methods to obtain SIM data: (i) static creep tests and (ii) dynamic frequency sweeps. This paper compares both methods on highly graphite filled polypropylene. Our studies on reproducibility of each method show that the uncertainty for 20 year prediction can be lower than 6% for both methods. While creep-based tests require a shorter experimental time, frequency sweep based tests show a lower scatter on the final result. The two main factors introducing uncertainty on the end results are related to (i) the reproducibility of the experimental raw data and (ii) the TTS optimisation using shift factors. The optimisation of the shift factors by a numerical method improves the accuracy of the master curve. By comparing creep and frequency sweep SIM, it shows that for predictions of one decade, the methods deliver very comparable results (less than 10% difference). For longer predictions, the methods differ and are not interchangeable. Furthermore, DMA was also effectively used as a three-point bending setup, providing information about strain rate sensitivity and the linear visco-elastic region using the same test setup and same sample dimensions as for TTS.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • experiment
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • creep
  • creep test
  • selective ion monitoring
  • dynamic mechanical analysis