People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Baere, Ives De
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (20/20 displayed)
- 2023Fatigue behaviour of thermoplastic glass/polypropylene composite cross-ply laminates : an experimental study with in-situ damage observations and numerical validationcitations
- 2023Experimental and numerical fatigue damage characterization in multidirectional thermoplastic glass/polypropylene laminates based on in-situ damage observationscitations
- 2023Relation between ASTM E606 specimen geometry and misalignment in strain-controlled fatigue testingcitations
- 2022Experimental and numerical damage characterization of glass/polypropylene multidirectional laminates under quasi-static loading conditioncitations
- 2021Long-term stiffness prediction of particle filled polymers by dynamic mechanical analysis : frequency sweep versus creep methodcitations
- 2021Multi scale digital image correlation for automatic edge detection of ply cracks in composite laminates under quasi static and fatigue loading
- 2020Influencing parameters on measurement accuracy in dynamic mechanical analysis of thermoplastic polymers and their compositescitations
- 2020Dynamic Curing Agents for Amine-Hardened Epoxy Vitrimers with Short (Re)processing Timescitations
- 2017Electrospun nanofibers for highly toughened fibre reinforced polymer composite laminates
- 2017Improved fatigue delamination behaviour of composite laminates with electrospun thermoplastic nanofibrous interleaves using the Central Cut-Ply methodcitations
- 2016Damage-resistant composites using electrospun nanofibers: a multiscale analysis of the toughening mechanismscitations
- 2016TOWARDS DAMAGE RESISTANT COMPOSITES USING ELECTROSPUN NANOFIBERS: A MULTISCALE ANALYSIS OF THE TOUGHENING MECHANISMS
- 2016Interlaminar toughening of resin transfer molded laminates by electrospun polycaprolactone structures : effect of the interleave morphologycitations
- 2016Increasing the damage resistance of composites by interleaving them with electrospun nanofibrous veils
- 2015Ultrasonic polar scan imaging of fatigued fiber reinforced composites
- 2015Using a polyester binder for the interlaminar toughening of glass/epoxy composite laminates
- 2014Damage Signature of Fatigued Fabric Reinforced Plastics in the Pulsed Ultrasonic Polar Scan
- 2013Modifying the crack growth in a glass fiber reinforced epoxy by adding polyamide 6 nanofibers
- 2012The influence of polyamide 6 nanofibres on the mechanical properties of glass fibre/epoxy composites
- 2007Strain monitoring in thermoplastic composites with optical fiber sensors: embedding process, visualization with micro-tomography, and fatigue results
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Long-term stiffness prediction of particle filled polymers by dynamic mechanical analysis : frequency sweep versus creep method
Abstract
The long-term service life of polymers can be estimated with much shorter experiments by applying the time temperature superposition principle (TTS). In this approach, data is obtained at different temperatures, usually through a stepped isothermal method (SIM) on the same sample. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) instruments offer two different measurement methods to obtain SIM data: (i) static creep tests and (ii) dynamic frequency sweeps. This paper compares both methods on highly graphite filled polypropylene. Our studies on reproducibility of each method show that the uncertainty for 20 year prediction can be lower than 6% for both methods. While creep-based tests require a shorter experimental time, frequency sweep based tests show a lower scatter on the final result. The two main factors introducing uncertainty on the end results are related to (i) the reproducibility of the experimental raw data and (ii) the TTS optimisation using shift factors. The optimisation of the shift factors by a numerical method improves the accuracy of the master curve. By comparing creep and frequency sweep SIM, it shows that for predictions of one decade, the methods deliver very comparable results (less than 10% difference). For longer predictions, the methods differ and are not interchangeable. Furthermore, DMA was also effectively used as a three-point bending setup, providing information about strain rate sensitivity and the linear visco-elastic region using the same test setup and same sample dimensions as for TTS.