Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Manning, Nick

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 45

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Additive and alternative materials to cement for well plugging and abandonment45citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Aslani, Farhad
1 / 71 shared
Valdez, Lulu Carvajal
1 / 1 shared
Zhang, Yifan
1 / 2 shared
Manning, David
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Aslani, Farhad
  • Valdez, Lulu Carvajal
  • Zhang, Yifan
  • Manning, David
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Additive and alternative materials to cement for well plugging and abandonment

  • Aslani, Farhad
  • Manning, Nick
  • Valdez, Lulu Carvajal
  • Zhang, Yifan
  • Manning, David
Abstract

<p>Data from Rystad Energy shows that, till 2020, the US Gulf of Mexico, the largest oil and gas production field, has a total of 34.4 thousand drilled wells with only 44% have been plugged and abandoned and 19.2 thousand wells are pending to be plugged in the future. Thereinto, 71% of the inventory is more than 40 years old. The US Environmental Protection Agency reported that in 2019, the annual CH<sub>4</sub> emission from these unplugged wells reached 209 Mt and the leakage of fluids could destroy the environment and threaten human health eventually. After the implementation of idle iron policy which requires titleholders to decommission the abandoned wells within specific periods, more wells are urgently to be plugged and abandoned. Cement or cementitious materials as the commonly used materials for well decommissioning serving as physical plugs, always suffer shrinkage, poor resistance to corrosive environment, instability under harsh environments, etc., which will initiate or accelerate fluid leakage. Furthermore, since the well conditions vary largely, the requirements or benchmarks of plugging materials may be completely different, this paper therefore aims to summarise and update the findings of past research and review papers, and list the regulations for well cementing as well as commonly used detection methods, identify available additives of ordinary cement that can modify the mechanical, physical, and chemical properties of cement plugs under specific well conditions, enumerate the potential alternative materials that can replace cement plugs, and eventually help the academia or industry to be familiar with relevant regulations or standards, material requirements, and associated detection technologies, recognise the available possibilities and determine the preferred ones easily. Findings of this paper indicate additives such as pozzolans, fibres, self-healing additives, and nanoparticles can significantly improve the mechanical properties, physical properties, chemical inertness, and durability. Alternatives including bentonite, bismuth, modified in-situ material, geopolymers, resin, and slags also exhibit adequate performance as cement replacement but require more field attempts to further assess their feasibilities.</p>

Topics
  • nanoparticle
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • cement
  • iron
  • durability
  • resin
  • Bismuth