Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Jiahao, Su

  • Google
  • 1
  • 7
  • 72

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021Effect of heat input on interfacial microstructure, tensile and bending properties of dissimilar Al/steel lap joints by laser Welding-brazing72citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Zhishui, Yu
1 / 1 shared
Chenkai, Gao
1 / 1 shared
Jin, Yang
1 / 2 shared
Caiwang, Tan
1 / 1 shared
Oliveira, João Pedro
1 / 98 shared
Yixuan, Zhao
1 / 1 shared
Hongbing, Liu
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Zhishui, Yu
  • Chenkai, Gao
  • Jin, Yang
  • Caiwang, Tan
  • Oliveira, João Pedro
  • Yixuan, Zhao
  • Hongbing, Liu
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effect of heat input on interfacial microstructure, tensile and bending properties of dissimilar Al/steel lap joints by laser Welding-brazing

  • Zhishui, Yu
  • Jiahao, Su
  • Chenkai, Gao
  • Jin, Yang
  • Caiwang, Tan
  • Oliveira, João Pedro
  • Yixuan, Zhao
  • Hongbing, Liu
Abstract

<p>Laser welding-brazing technique was used for lap joining of Q235 steel to AA5052 aluminum alloy using a flux-cored Zn-22Al filler wire. The influence of heat input on microstructure, joint strength and bending property of laser Al/steel joints was investigated. The results showed that the types of interfacial intermetallic compounds (IMCs) were kept unchanged with the different laser powers, i.e., Fe<sub>2</sub>Al<sub>5-x</sub>Zn<sub>x</sub> phase and FeZn<sub>10</sub>; while the thickness and morphology of IMC layer changed significantly. This was mainly ascribed to the large increase of the interfacial temperature with the rising laser power, which led to an intensified diffusion reaction. The fracture load first increased and then reached a plateau with the increasing laser power. However, the laser power had very limited influence on the joint bending property because of the formation of dispersed tough FeZn<sub>10</sub>. Numerical simulation indicated that the interfacial temperature along the interfacial region varied, decreasing from the weld root to weld toe. The peak temperature increased by 700 ℃ and liquid–solid reaction time increased 3.41 s with the increased laser power, which was responsible for the change of IMCs layer.</p>

Topics
  • compound
  • phase
  • simulation
  • aluminium
  • strength
  • steel
  • intermetallic
  • interfacial
  • wire
  • joining