Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kimiaei, Mehrdad

  • Google
  • 4
  • 8
  • 65

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2023Experimental investigation on the structural behaviour of novel non-metallic pultruded circular tubular GFRP T-joints under axial compression7citations
  • 2022Investigation on the structural failure behaviour of pultruded circular tubular GFRP multiplanar truss bridges with non-metallic connections through finite element modelling8citations
  • 2021Experimental and numerical investigation of underwater composite repair with fibre reinforced polymers in corroded tubular offshore structural members under concentric and eccentric axial loads37citations
  • 2015Sensitivity studies of SCR fatigue damage in the touchdown zone using an efficient simplified framework for stress range evaluation13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Higgoda, Thumitha Mandula
2 / 2 shared
Yang, Bo
2 / 20 shared
Guo, Xiao
1 / 3 shared
Wittek, Adam
1 / 3 shared
Fawzia, Sabrina
1 / 2 shared
George, Jerin
1 / 1 shared
Randolph, Mark
1 / 10 shared
Quéau, L. M.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2021
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Higgoda, Thumitha Mandula
  • Yang, Bo
  • Guo, Xiao
  • Wittek, Adam
  • Fawzia, Sabrina
  • George, Jerin
  • Randolph, Mark
  • Quéau, L. M.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Sensitivity studies of SCR fatigue damage in the touchdown zone using an efficient simplified framework for stress range evaluation

  • Randolph, Mark
  • Quéau, L. M.
  • Kimiaei, Mehrdad
Abstract

© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Steel catenary risers (SCRs) are widely used in deep water. Several sources of nonlinearities make SCR fatigue design challenging. Limited understanding of the influence of the various input parameters on the structural response of SCRs leads to unnecessarily high conservatism in design. Also, time consuming numerical simulations are usually performed to assess SCR fatigue damage which is inefficient, especially for early design stages. A simplified framework for fatigue analysis of SCRs in the touchdown zone (TDZ) has been developed previously, using artificial neural networks. The approach may be used to efficiently estimate maximum static and dynamic stress ranges in the TDZ, from which the fatigue damage can be deduced. Comparison of the maximum static and dynamic stress changes for a given input motion allows quantification of the dynamic amplification factor (DAF). This paper explores the sensitivity of the maximum dynamic stress ranges and DAF to the key dimensionless groups of input parameters and also certain individual input parameters. The study illustrates the usefulness of the proposed framework in understanding SCR behaviour in the TDZ, providing guidance on optimisation of SCR design from a fatigue perspective. The paper also reflects on the potential benefits of using DAFs for SCR fatigue design.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • steel
  • fatigue