Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ala-Heikkila, J.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017Detector resolution in positron annihilation Doppler broadening experiments2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tuomisto, Filip
1 / 44 shared
Heikinheimo, J.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tuomisto, Filip
  • Heikinheimo, J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Detector resolution in positron annihilation Doppler broadening experiments

  • Ala-Heikkila, J.
  • Tuomisto, Filip
  • Heikinheimo, J.
Abstract

<p>Positron annihilation Doppler broadening spectroscopy characterizes lattice point defects and is sensitive to very small vacancy densities. High-purity germanium detectors are generally used for recording the Doppler broadening spectrum because they provide good energy resolution and stability. However, the energy resolution of a germanium detector is somewhat dependent on the photon absorption geometry in the detector crystal. This change in the energy resolution changes also the Doppler broadening parameters. To observe the dependency of the resolution function and the Doppler broadening parameters, we performed experiments on Si samples in standard sandwich configuration with a Na-22 source. We changed the radiation geometry of the incident gamma photons via altering the distance of the sample-source package from the detector and by adding steel between the source and the detector. We observed the change of the absorption geometry in the germanium detector crystal by doing Monte Carlo simulations. The aim of this study is to help understand and decide what is the best way to compare the Doppler broadening parameters obtained with different measurement setups and even with the same setup when the geometry in the measurements has changed. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • simulation
  • steel
  • vacancy
  • Germanium
  • point defect