Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Gutiérrez, Raúl Enrique Beltrán

  • Google
  • 2
  • 9
  • 3

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Analysis of the Repeatability of the Pencil Lead Break in Comparison to the Ball Impact and Electromagnetic Body-Noise Actuatorcitations
  • 2023Frequency dependent amplitude response of different couplant materials for mounting piezoelectric sensors3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ostermann, Jörn
2 / 4 shared
Jiang, Nan
1 / 4 shared
Marx, Steffen
2 / 34 shared
Krause, Thomas
1 / 1 shared
Lange, Alexander
2 / 7 shared
Hinrichs, Reemt
1 / 2 shared
Schmidt, Boso
1 / 2 shared
Käding, Max
2 / 6 shared
Xu, Ronghua
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ostermann, Jörn
  • Jiang, Nan
  • Marx, Steffen
  • Krause, Thomas
  • Lange, Alexander
  • Hinrichs, Reemt
  • Schmidt, Boso
  • Käding, Max
  • Xu, Ronghua
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Frequency dependent amplitude response of different couplant materials for mounting piezoelectric sensors

  • Ostermann, Jörn
  • Gutiérrez, Raúl Enrique Beltrán
  • Marx, Steffen
  • Lange, Alexander
  • Xu, Ronghua
  • Käding, Max
Abstract

<p>Non-destructive testing techniques, such as ultrasonic testing and acoustic emission analysis, commonly employ piezoelectric sensors for monitoring and detecting defects in structures. The quality of data acquired using these sensors is highly dependent on the coupling layer between the transducer and the structure's surface. In this context, this study compares the signal response of four different couplant materials, namely acrylic adhesive pads, honey, vaseline, and hot glue, applied to a steel surface. For this purpose, experiments were conducted using a laser Doppler vibrometer and acoustic emission analysis to investigate the signal transmission of the couplant materials and their impact on the signal response of a coupled piezoelectric sensor VS30-V. The repeatability of the experiments was statistically analyzed. The findings indicate that acoustic emission measurements with acrylic adhesive pads exhibited the lowest relative standard deviation of 11.4%, followed by honey (13.2%), hot glue (21.9%), and vaseline (32.1%). The investigated couplant materials exhibited different effects on the signal response of the piezoelectric sensor. Specifically, acrylic adhesive pads and hot glue demonstrated more reliable signal transmission in the frequency range of 50 kHz to 65 kHz. In contrast, honey and vaseline had better performance within the frequency range of 65 kHz and 80 kHz. Considering the frequency-dependent characteristics of signal transmission and the ease of application, acrylic adhesive pads and honey are considered the preferred couplant materials for the frequency ranges of 50 kHz to 65 kHz and 65 kHz to 80 kHz, respectively.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • experiment
  • steel
  • defect
  • ultrasonic
  • acoustic emission