Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Garcia, Heriberto

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Feasibility of developing green water batteries based on poly-lactic acid and polybutylene succinatecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Davachi, Seyed Mohammad
1 / 8 shared
Dastjerdi, Miaad
1 / 1 shared
Dastjerdi, Arman Mohammad-Ali
1 / 1 shared
Dastjerdi, Pegah Mohammad-Ali
1 / 1 shared
Dastjerdi, Javad
1 / 1 shared
Shiroud Heidari, Behzad
1 / 9 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Davachi, Seyed Mohammad
  • Dastjerdi, Miaad
  • Dastjerdi, Arman Mohammad-Ali
  • Dastjerdi, Pegah Mohammad-Ali
  • Dastjerdi, Javad
  • Shiroud Heidari, Behzad
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Feasibility of developing green water batteries based on poly-lactic acid and polybutylene succinate

  • Garcia, Heriberto
  • Davachi, Seyed Mohammad
  • Dastjerdi, Miaad
  • Dastjerdi, Arman Mohammad-Ali
  • Dastjerdi, Pegah Mohammad-Ali
  • Dastjerdi, Javad
  • Shiroud Heidari, Behzad
Abstract

<p>Developing water-saving technologies such as Groasis Waterboxx (GW) based on environmentally friendly materials is a robust strategy to undermine the destructive effects of the agricultural industry on nature and society. Here, we simulated the injection molding process of green GWs made of poly-lactic acid (PLA) and polybutylene succinate (PBS) and analyzed the performance of the parts in heavy-duty conditions. The effects of different process parameters on cycle time, consumed energy, and final product qualities, including mechanical and visual aspects, were investigated by Autodesk Moldflow to compare biopolymers with polypropylene (PP). GW performance in the Sahara Desert was simulated with the help of Abaqus. The simulations results revealed that PLA exhibited shorter injection and cooling times compared to PP, with reduction of 44% and 56%, respectively, thus indicating faster production speed. However, PBS-based part demonstrated mechanical qualities similar to PP. PLA shows lower shrinkage and warpage than PP despite that environmental simulations illustrated that PLA is impractical for use in areas with high thermal stresses because of overlapping the glass transition and ground temperature, leading to failure near land surface regions. The results are in qualitative agreement with experimental results reported by the manufacturer. Despite its biodegradability, PBS could provide a high safety factor of about 82% of PP samples. Although the injection of PBS consumed more energy than PP because of the higher required injection pressure, replacing PP with PBS is justified considering its high efficiency and eco-friendliness.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • simulation
  • glass
  • glass
  • injection molding