Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Zhong, T.

  • Google
  • 3
  • 4
  • 95

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2015Hot working mechanisms in DMD-processed versus cast AZ31-1 wt.% Ca alloy16citations
  • 2014Hot deformation mechanisms, microstructure and texture evolution in extruded AZ31–nano-alumina composite34citations
  • 2013Processing maps, microstructure evolution and deformation mechanisms of extruded AZ31-DMD during hot uniaxial compression45citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Suresh, K.
1 / 38 shared
Gupta, M.
3 / 21 shared
Prasad, Y. V. R. K.
3 / 66 shared
Zhao, F.
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2015
2014
2013

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Suresh, K.
  • Gupta, M.
  • Prasad, Y. V. R. K.
  • Zhao, F.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Hot working mechanisms in DMD-processed versus cast AZ31-1 wt.% Ca alloy

  • Suresh, K.
  • Gupta, M.
  • Zhong, T.
  • Prasad, Y. V. R. K.
Abstract

The hot deformation behavior of AZ31-1Ca magnesium alloy prepared by disintegrated melt deposition (DMD) technique is compared with that in as-cast (AC) condition. The microstructure of the DMD-processed material exhibited fine grain structure with fibering and intense basal texture along the extrusion direction unlike the AC material which had large grains and near random orientation. The processing maps developed on DMD-processed alloy exhibited three domains within the following ranges of temperature/strain rates: (1) 250-360°C/0.0003-0.01s<sup>-1</sup>, (2) 430-500°C/0.0003-0.1s<sup>-1</sup>; (3) 325-400°C/0.3-10s<sup>-1</sup>. In the map for the AC alloy, Domain 1 occurred at higher temperature and Domain 3 was absent. Domain 1 in both conditions represents dynamic recrystallization (DRX) which is nucleated by basal+prismatic slip along with simultaneous recovery by dislocation climb controlled by lattice self-diffusion. In Domain 2 of DMD-processed alloy, grain boundary sliding and wedge cracking occurred leading to intercrystalline fracture in tension while in the AC alloy DRX has occurred to enhance the workability. In Domain 3 of DMD-processed alloy, DRX is nucleated by basal+prismatic slip with climb occurring via grain boundary self-diffusion. In the AC alloy, Domain 3 is absent since the large grain size reduced the grain boundary self-diffusion. Hot working DMD-processed alloy is best done at lower temperatures and higher strain rates (350°C and 10s<sup>-1</sup>) while the AC alloy may be processed at higher temperatures and lower strain rates (475°C and &lt;0.1s<sup>-1</sup>).

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • grain
  • grain size
  • grain boundary
  • Magnesium
  • magnesium alloy
  • Magnesium
  • melt
  • extrusion
  • dislocation
  • texture
  • random
  • recrystallization