Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Nath, S. K.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 9
  • 33

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2013Physical simulation of hot deformation and microstructural evolution of AISI 1016 steel using processing maps33citations
  • 2013Magnetization and magnetic behavior of Ni1-xCdxFe2O4 ferritescitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Dikovits, Martina
1 / 6 shared
Chaudhari, G. P.
1 / 2 shared
Pancholi, V.
1 / 2 shared
Warchomicka, Fernando Gustavo
1 / 15 shared
Rajput, S. K.
1 / 1 shared
Poletti, Maria Cecilia
1 / 79 shared
Sikder, S. S.
1 / 6 shared
Hoque, S. M.
1 / 1 shared
Hakim, M. A.
1 / 10 shared
Chart of publication period
2013

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Dikovits, Martina
  • Chaudhari, G. P.
  • Pancholi, V.
  • Warchomicka, Fernando Gustavo
  • Rajput, S. K.
  • Poletti, Maria Cecilia
  • Sikder, S. S.
  • Hoque, S. M.
  • Hakim, M. A.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Physical simulation of hot deformation and microstructural evolution of AISI 1016 steel using processing maps

  • Dikovits, Martina
  • Chaudhari, G. P.
  • Pancholi, V.
  • Warchomicka, Fernando Gustavo
  • Nath, S. K.
  • Rajput, S. K.
  • Poletti, Maria Cecilia
Abstract

The hot deformation behavior of AISI 1016 steel is studied by performing hot compression tests in the Gleeble® 3800 physical simulator in the temperature range 750–1050 °C after austenitization at 1050 °C for 5 min. The strain rates used vary from 0.01 to 80 s−1 and the total true strain achieved is 0.7. The microstructural evolution is described based on light optical and scanning electron microscopy of the deformed and water quenched samples. An EBSD measurement on selected sample in the two-phase field is used to determine the microstructural changes in the ferritic phase. Then, processing windows are created using dynamic materials model, modified dynamic materials model, and strain rate sensitivity maps, which are correlated with the microstructural development. In order to determine the flow instability ranges produced by flow localization, different instability parameters are employed and compared. The processing map obtained using the power dissipation efficiency, η, correlates well with microstructural changes observed due to the dependency of this parameter on strain rate sensitivity m. Although instability zones predicted by the instability parameter κj are similar to these predicted by flow localization parameter α, the latter approach is physically explained by the thermal softening due to adiabatic flow at high strain rates. Using sinh type constitutive equation, the average apparent activation energy for hot deformation of AISI 1016 steel is 290 kJ/mol and the stress exponent n is 3.8, indicating plastic deformation by dislocation gliding and climbing.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • phase
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • simulation
  • steel
  • dislocation
  • compression test
  • activation
  • electron backscatter diffraction