Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sippola, Mika

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 65

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2007Evolution of microstructure and failure mechanism of lead-free solder interconnections in power cycling and thermal shock tests65citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mattila, Toni
1 / 2 shared
Vuorinen, Vesa
1 / 48 shared
Kivilahti, Jorma
1 / 7 shared
Laurila, Tomi
1 / 96 shared
Karppinen, Juha
1 / 1 shared
Li, Jue
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mattila, Toni
  • Vuorinen, Vesa
  • Kivilahti, Jorma
  • Laurila, Tomi
  • Karppinen, Juha
  • Li, Jue
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Evolution of microstructure and failure mechanism of lead-free solder interconnections in power cycling and thermal shock tests

  • Mattila, Toni
  • Vuorinen, Vesa
  • Kivilahti, Jorma
  • Laurila, Tomi
  • Sippola, Mika
  • Karppinen, Juha
  • Li, Jue
Abstract

<p>Failure mechanisms of lead-free solder interconnections in power cycling and thermal shock tests have been investigated in this work. Even though there are some characteristic differences between the two tests, the failures in both cases were induced by recrystallization-assisted crack nucleation and propagation. The three major differences between the tests were: (i) minimum temperature during power cycling was considerably higher in comparison to thermal shock, (ii) the current flow in the power cycling test resulted in electromigration, and (iii) in the power cycling test heat originates locally from components themselves. These differences were also reflected in the test results in the following way: firstly, in the power cycling test the recrystallization occurred earlier than in the thermal shock test, mainly owing to the higher average temperature and secondly, the enhanced growth of intermetallic compound layer at the anode side due to the electromigration was observed during power cycling.</p>

Topics
  • compound
  • crack
  • intermetallic
  • recrystallization