Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Anbalagan, Arivazhagan

  • Google
  • 7
  • 18
  • 74

Coventry University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2023Synthesis and characterisation of graphene-reinforced AA 2014 MMC using squeeze casting method for lightweight aerospace structural applications24citations
  • 2023Investigation on CFRP 3D printing build parameters and their effect on topologically optimised complex models5citations
  • 2023Processing and characterization of aluminium alloy 6061 graphene composite printed by direct metal laser sintering7citations
  • 2023Novel Machining Configuration of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Using Wire Electric Discharge Machining (WEDM)4citations
  • 2023Synthesis and characterisation of graphene-reinforced AA 2014 MMC using squeeze casting method for lightweight aerospace structural applications.24citations
  • 2021A FEA simulation study of ball end mill for fixed 3+1 / 3+2 axis machining of Ti-6Al-4V5citations
  • 2021A FEA simulation study of ball end mill for fixed 3+1 / 3+2 axis machining of Ti-6Al-4V.5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Pazhani, Ashwath
5 / 27 shared
Moganraj, Arivarasu
2 / 2 shared
Batako, Andre
4 / 7 shared
Paulsamy, Jeyapandiarajan
2 / 2 shared
Xavior, M. Anthony
2 / 18 shared
Shanthi Bhavan, Jayesh
1 / 6 shared
Jayaseelan, Joel
2 / 3 shared
Venkatraman, M.
2 / 4 shared
Launchbury, Edward James
1 / 1 shared
Michael, Anthony Xavior
3 / 4 shared
Kauffman, Marcos
1 / 1 shared
Jeyapandiarajan, P.
1 / 6 shared
Joel, J.
1 / 11 shared
Venugopal, Anirudh
1 / 2 shared
Anthony, Xavior M.
1 / 1 shared
Anthony Xavior, M.
1 / 3 shared
Shanthi Bavan, Jayesh
1 / 1 shared
Arumugam, Eakambaram
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Pazhani, Ashwath
  • Moganraj, Arivarasu
  • Batako, Andre
  • Paulsamy, Jeyapandiarajan
  • Xavior, M. Anthony
  • Shanthi Bhavan, Jayesh
  • Jayaseelan, Joel
  • Venkatraman, M.
  • Launchbury, Edward James
  • Michael, Anthony Xavior
  • Kauffman, Marcos
  • Jeyapandiarajan, P.
  • Joel, J.
  • Venugopal, Anirudh
  • Anthony, Xavior M.
  • Anthony Xavior, M.
  • Shanthi Bavan, Jayesh
  • Arumugam, Eakambaram
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

A FEA simulation study of ball end mill for fixed 3+1 / 3+2 axis machining of Ti-6Al-4V

  • Arumugam, Eakambaram
  • Michael, Anthony Xavior
  • Anbalagan, Arivazhagan
Abstract

<p>This paper presents a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulation study conducted on ball endmill for fixed 3 + 1 and 3 + 2 axis orientations for machining Ti-6Al-4 V. This work adopts a tungsten carbide (WC) ∅18.6 mm diametrical/6fluted ball endmill to analyse maximum principal elastic strain (ϵ<sub>max-max-principal-elastic</sub>), maximum principal stress (σ<sub>max-principal)</sub>along with cutting tools forces in the axial (F<sub>z</sub>), radial (F<sub>y</sub>), tangential (F<sub>x</sub>) and total (F<sub>total</sub>) directions. The machining orientations considered for 3 + 1 and 3 + 2 axis are (i) tilt angles of 5°, 10°, 15° &amp; 20° and (ii) lead angles of 5°, 10° &amp; 15° with a constant fixed tilt angle of 10°. The cutting speed and feed rate per tooth is taken as 450 m/min and 0.5 mm/tooth. These are based on a high speed machining (HSM) scenario and has been dynamically simulated for a maximum of 175,000 cycles. From the simulation study considered at 16-20 valid cutting points, it can be noticed that in 3 + 1 axis, for a tilt angle of 10° and 3 + 2 axis for a Tilt 10°/Lead 10° the σ<sub>max-principal</sub>and ϵ<sub>max-max-principal-elastic</sub>are higher when compared with all tilt/lead angles. In case of total forces (F<sub>total</sub>) from all 3 directions (F<sub>x</sub>, F<sub>y</sub>and F<sub>z</sub>) not much variation can be noticed for different tilt/lead angles, but higher values are recorded with 3 + 1 axis at 5° tilt angle and 3 + 2 axis at tilt/lead angle of 10°. The paper provides a critical comparative study on the 3 + 1/ 3 + 2 axis orientations highlighting the cutting strain/stress with tool forces at valid cutting points considering entry, middle and exit region of the blank by emphasizing the importance of cutting tool design parameters.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • carbide
  • tungsten
  • finite element analysis