Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Jansen, H. C.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 7
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Mapping strain across Co80Ta7B13 / Co62Ta6B32 glassy interfacescitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Keckes, Julius
1 / 4 shared
Evertz, S.
1 / 3 shared
Eckert, Jürgen
1 / 1035 shared
Gammer, C.
1 / 27 shared
Zalesak, Jakub
1 / 14 shared
Hans, Marcus
1 / 38 shared
Sheng, Huaping
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Keckes, Julius
  • Evertz, S.
  • Eckert, Jürgen
  • Gammer, C.
  • Zalesak, Jakub
  • Hans, Marcus
  • Sheng, Huaping
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Mapping strain across Co80Ta7B13 / Co62Ta6B32 glassy interfaces

  • Keckes, Julius
  • Jansen, H. C.
  • Evertz, S.
  • Eckert, Jürgen
  • Gammer, C.
  • Zalesak, Jakub
  • Hans, Marcus
  • Sheng, Huaping
Abstract

While multilayered thin film metallic glasses offer promising mechanical properties due to their interfaces, the correlation between chemical composition and and strain at the interfaces has not been investigated so far. Hence, atomic distance and composition variations across glassy Co80Ta7B13 / Co62Ta6B32 interfaces are revealed by correlative transmission electron microscopy, nanobeam precession electron diffraction (NBPED) mapping and atom probe tomography (APT). A composition dependent mean atomic distance is identified for the individual layers. At the interfaces, a chemically graded region of 4 nm thickness is observed with APT, while the mean atomic distance gradient - investigated by NBPED mapping - extends over 9 nm and cannot solely be explained by chemical composition changes. Instead, the excess thickness of the atomic distance gradient compared to the chemical gradient can be rationalized by the presence of strain at the interface.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • thin film
  • electron diffraction
  • glass
  • glass
  • chemical composition
  • transmission electron microscopy
  • atom probe tomography