Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Stratoudaki, Theodosia

  • Google
  • 7
  • 26
  • 74

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2020In-process calibration of a non-destructive testing system used for in-process inspection of multi-pass welding29citations
  • 2018Laser induced phased arrays for remote ultrasonic imaging of additive manufactured componentscitations
  • 2015Fabrication of Cheap Optical Transducers (CHOTs) on film carriers for in-situ application and generation of surface acoustic waves1citations
  • 2008Measurement of elastic nonlinearity using remote laser ultrasonics and CHeap Optical Transducers and dual frequency surface acoustic waves13citations
  • 2007Cheap optical transducers (CHOTs) for narrowband ultrasonic applications21citations
  • 2003The role of epoxy resin in the mechanism of laser generated ultrasound in carbon fiber reinforced composites6citations
  • 2001Laser generated ultrasound4citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lines, David
1 / 18 shared
Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala
1 / 11 shared
Mohseni, Ehsan
1 / 22 shared
Mineo, Carmelo
1 / 15 shared
Gachagan, Anthony
1 / 76 shared
Qiu, Zhen
1 / 14 shared
Sweeney, Nina E.
1 / 3 shared
Vasilev, Momchil
1 / 17 shared
Javadi, Yashar
2 / 31 shared
Macleod, Charles N.
1 / 45 shared
Pierce, Stephen
1 / 51 shared
Kerr, William
1 / 3 shared
Wilcox, Paul D.
1 / 6 shared
Pieris, Don
1 / 4 shared
Clark, Matt
1 / 8 shared
Ageeva, V.
1 / 1 shared
Clark, M.
3 / 4 shared
Somekh, M. G.
3 / 3 shared
Collison, I. J.
1 / 1 shared
Hernandez, J. A.
1 / 2 shared
Dixon, Steve
1 / 24 shared
Edwards, Christopher
1 / 2 shared
Palmer, Stuart B.
1 / 1 shared
Dixon, S.
1 / 5 shared
Edwards, C.
1 / 2 shared
Palmer, S.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2018
2015
2008
2007
2003
2001

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lines, David
  • Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Mineo, Carmelo
  • Gachagan, Anthony
  • Qiu, Zhen
  • Sweeney, Nina E.
  • Vasilev, Momchil
  • Javadi, Yashar
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Pierce, Stephen
  • Kerr, William
  • Wilcox, Paul D.
  • Pieris, Don
  • Clark, Matt
  • Ageeva, V.
  • Clark, M.
  • Somekh, M. G.
  • Collison, I. J.
  • Hernandez, J. A.
  • Dixon, Steve
  • Edwards, Christopher
  • Palmer, Stuart B.
  • Dixon, S.
  • Edwards, C.
  • Palmer, S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

In-process calibration of a non-destructive testing system used for in-process inspection of multi-pass welding

  • Stratoudaki, Theodosia
  • Lines, David
  • Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Mineo, Carmelo
  • Gachagan, Anthony
  • Qiu, Zhen
  • Sweeney, Nina E.
  • Vasilev, Momchil
  • Javadi, Yashar
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Pierce, Stephen
Abstract

In multi-pass welding, there is increasing motivation to move towards in-process defect detection to enable real-time repair; thus avoiding deposition of more layers over a defective weld pass. All defect detection techniques require a consistent and repeatable approach to calibration to ensure that measured defect sizing is accurate. Conventional approaches to calibration employ fixed test blocks with known defect sizes, however, this methodology can lead to incorrect sizing when considering complex geometries, materials with challenging microstructure, and the significant thermal gradients present in materials during the inter-pass inspection period. To circumvent these challenges, the authors present a novel approach to calibration and introduce the concept of in-process calibration applied to ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). The new concept is centred around the manufacturing of a second duplication sample, containing intentionally-embedded tungsten inclusions, with identical process parameters as the main sample. Both samples are then inspected using a high-temperature robotic NDT process to allow direct comparative measurements to be established between the real part and the calibration sample. It is demonstrated that in-process weld defect detection using the in-process calibration technique can more reliably identify defects in samples which would otherwise pass the acceptance test using a traditional calibration.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • inclusion
  • positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy
  • Photoacoustic spectroscopy
  • ultrasonic
  • tungsten