Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Forrestal, David

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 99

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Mechanical behaviour of flexible 3D printed gyroid structures as a tuneable replacement for soft padding foam48citations
  • 2020Auxetic tubular scaffolds via melt electrowriting51citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lamont, Riki
1 / 1 shared
Powell, Sean
1 / 2 shared
Daley, Ryan
2 / 2 shared
Singh, Dilpreet
1 / 3 shared
Slattery, Peter
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lamont, Riki
  • Powell, Sean
  • Daley, Ryan
  • Singh, Dilpreet
  • Slattery, Peter
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Auxetic tubular scaffolds via melt electrowriting

  • Forrestal, David
  • Daley, Ryan
Abstract

<p>Auxetics are an interesting class of materials that expand in transverse directions when tensile loading is applied. For example, in contrast to conventional materials, an auxetic tube will increase in diameter when stretched along its axis. To date, auxetic tubular scaffolds have been proposed for applications in tissue engineering and soft robotics; however, they have not yet been routinely produced in precisely-engineered microfibre structures using the melt electrowriting additive manufacturing method. Using a custom melt electrowriting device and rotating mandrel collector, scaffolds with a re-entrant honeycomb unit cell pattern were designed and fabricated from polycaprolactone microfibres. These scaffolds were tensile tested to characterise their auxetic properties compared to traditional crosshatch-patterned tubular scaffolds. The auxetic scaffolds exhibited an increase in diameter up to 80.8%, as predicted from the unit cell pattern at maximum strain of 14.1%, resulting in a Poisson's ratio of −5.8. By comparison, crosshatch scaffolds exhibited a similar stress-strain profile to the auxetic tubular scaffold with identical pore size, however significant radial compression was observed leading to a Poisson's ratio of +5.7. This study reports the design and fabrication of auxetic tubular microfibre scaffolds fabricated via melt electrowriting for the first time and offers a versatile fibre patterning system towards applications in biofabrication and robotics.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • pore
  • melt
  • additive manufacturing
  • Poisson's ratio