Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Melo-Fonseca, F.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 10
  • 39

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2021Surface characterization of titanium-based substrates for orthopaedic applications16citations
  • 201845S5 BAG-Ti6Al4V structures23citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Gasik, Michael
2 / 46 shared
Miranda, G.
2 / 24 shared
Madeira, S.
1 / 9 shared
Silva, F. S.
2 / 28 shared
Costa, M. M.
1 / 7 shared
Bartolomeu, F.
1 / 7 shared
Silva, N. A.
1 / 20 shared
Lima, R.
1 / 4 shared
Miranda, A.
1 / 5 shared
Alves, N.
1 / 10 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Gasik, Michael
  • Miranda, G.
  • Madeira, S.
  • Silva, F. S.
  • Costa, M. M.
  • Bartolomeu, F.
  • Silva, N. A.
  • Lima, R.
  • Miranda, A.
  • Alves, N.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Surface characterization of titanium-based substrates for orthopaedic applications

  • Gasik, Michael
  • Miranda, G.
  • Madeira, S.
  • Silva, F. S.
  • Melo-Fonseca, F.
Abstract

Orthopaedic implants for load-bearing applications are usually composed of titanium-based materials. Aiming to propose a strategy able to improve the bone-implant interface on these implants, commercially pure titanium and Ti6Al4V alloy were subjected to anodic oxidation, hydrothermal treatment and to anodic oxidation followed by hydrothermal treatment and the produced oxide film was investigated. In addition, different mechanical (as-received vs mechanical polished) and chemical pre-treatments (alcohol cleaning vs acidic pre-treatment) were studied. No significant differences were found between the chemical pre-treatments, whereas upon different surface treatments the TiO2 layer presented different characteristics, namely regarding its crystallinity, roughness, thickness and wettability. The hydrothermal treatment followed by immersion for 24 h in 5XPBS was effective in creating a potentially bioactive oxide film, given the presence of anatase and rutile phases, and a hydrophilic layer for both Ti materials. Ti grade 2 subjected to alcohol cleaning and hydrothermal treatment resulted in a surface roughness of 226.7 ± 3.1 nm and water contact angle of 67.2 ± 8.7°, whereas for the Ti grade 5 subjected to the same surface treatment, Ra was equal to 20.4 ± 1.7 nm and the water contact angle to 83.5 ± 4.7°. In this context, the hydrothermal treatment is proposed as a simple treatment capable of improving the characteristics of the implant surface, thereby promoting osteoconductivity.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • phase
  • titanium
  • alcohol
  • crystallinity
  • commercially pure titanium