Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Chassagne, Claire

  • Google
  • 12
  • 11
  • 182

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (12/12 displayed)

  • 2022Tuning the rheological properties of kaolin suspensions using biopolymers11citations
  • 2022Rheology of Flocculated Suspension in Turbidity Currentscitations
  • 2022Effects of organic matter degradation in cohesive sediment9citations
  • 2022From fundamentals to implementation of yield stress for nautical bottom : case study of the Port of Hamburg4citations
  • 2022Why do settling and yield stress of mud differ in european ports?citations
  • 2022From fundamentals to implementation of yield stress for nautical bottom: Case study of the Port of Hamburg4citations
  • 2021Rheology of Mud5citations
  • 2020Using in situ density and strength measurements for sediment maintenance in ports and waterways20citations
  • 2020Yield stress measurements of mud sediments using different rheological methods and geometries46citations
  • 2019Is density enough to predict the rheology of natural sediments?29citations
  • 2019Rheological analysis of mud from Port of Hamburg, Germany49citations
  • 2017Dielectric spectroscopy of granular material in an electrolytesolution of any ionic strength5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Shakeel, Ahmad
11 / 16 shared
Kirichek, Alex
12 / 18 shared
Ali, Waqas
1 / 1 shared
Helmons, Rudy
1 / 1 shared
Ali, W.
1 / 7 shared
Enthoven, D. H. B.
1 / 1 shared
Gebert, Julia
2 / 2 shared
Zander, Florian
1 / 1 shared
Bornholdt, Jasper
2 / 2 shared
Ohle, Nino
2 / 2 shared
Ghose, Ranajit
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2020
2019
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Shakeel, Ahmad
  • Kirichek, Alex
  • Ali, Waqas
  • Helmons, Rudy
  • Ali, W.
  • Enthoven, D. H. B.
  • Gebert, Julia
  • Zander, Florian
  • Bornholdt, Jasper
  • Ohle, Nino
  • Ghose, Ranajit
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Yield stress measurements of mud sediments using different rheological methods and geometries

  • Chassagne, Claire
  • Shakeel, Ahmad
  • Kirichek, Alex
Abstract

<p>Yield stress materials have a wide range of commercial applications. Yet, the suitable way of determining the yield stress values of a given material has been the subject of many studies and debates. Yield stresses are dependent on the material (shear) history and composition, which implies that robust protocols should be developed to study the yield stress dependence on a given parameter. In this study, three natural mud samples from a port having different densities were chosen for analysis. Four different geometries including concentric cylinders (Couette), cone and plate, parallel plates, and vane geometries were used. Our aim was to find the geometry and measurement protocol that best adapted to natural mud samples: the measurement should be reasonably fast and the major changes in sample structure (two-step yielding) should be recorded within the same measurement. Various rheological experiments such as stress sweep, oscillatory amplitude sweep, creep and stress growth tests were tested. Two-step yielding behavior was observed for the mud samples in stress sweep and amplitude sweep tests. The first yield point was linked with the breakage of interconnected network of aggregates/flocs while the second one was attributed to the collapse of aggregates into the smaller flocs or individual particles. Stress sweep tests proved to be practical, time efficient, and reliable tests for measuring yield stress values. Our study showed that Couette and parallel plate geometries are the most suitable geometries for analyzing the two yield stresses of the samples. Vane geometry is appropriate to study consolidated (solid-like) systems as for these samples a Couette geometry cannot be used because the bob could get stuck during the experiment.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • creep