Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Reinders, Jörn

  • Google
  • 5
  • 3
  • 100

Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2016Surface and form alterations in retrieved shoulder hemiarthroplasty.7citations
  • 2015Fatigue performance of medical Ti6Al4V alloy after mechanical surface treatments.62citations
  • 2015Fatigue Performance of Medical Ti6Al4V Alloy after Mechanical Surface Treatmentscitations
  • 2013Wear performance of ceramic-on-metal hip bearings.15citations
  • 2012[Principles of tribological analysis of endoprostheses].16citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sonntag, Robert
1 / 2 shared
Gibmeier, Jens
1 / 26 shared
Kretzer, J. Philippe
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2016
2015
2013
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sonntag, Robert
  • Gibmeier, Jens
  • Kretzer, J. Philippe
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Surface and form alterations in retrieved shoulder hemiarthroplasty.

  • Reinders, Jörn
Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>Shoulder hemiarthroplasty is a viable treatment for shoulder arthritis, particularly if the natural glenoid is still intact. One of the most common reasons for revision surgery is glenoid erosion, where the cartilage or bone is worn. The aim of the current study was to analyze whether the metallic articular surface of retrieved shoulder hemiarthroplasty is different from new implants. We hypothesized that the surface roughness would increase as a result of the articulation and that metallic wear would be detectable on the implants.<h4>Methods</h4>Included were 13 retrieved and 3 new shoulder hemiarthroplasties. The surface roughness was measured on different sites of the surface (dome of the head and the rim). The implants were further measured using a coordinate measuring machine to gain information on volumetric wear and geometric alterations. The surface was analyzed with a scanning electron microscope to see marks of wear.<h4>Results</h4>Compared with new implants, the surface roughness on the retrievals was significantly increased. The roughness parameters within the retrieval group were generally higher at the dome of the head than at the rim; however, this difference was not significant. Apart from shape deviations caused by deformation of the retrievals, no volumetric wear was detectable on the heads.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The current results indicate that the roughness of the surface of the implant and the shape changes occur in vivo and that the material incurs damaged caused by the articulation against the softer cartilage or bone. Increasing roughness of the humeral component may be one cause for glenoid erosion over time.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface