People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Sudireddy, Bhaskar Reddy
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (41/41 displayed)
- 2024Fabrication framework for metal supported solid oxide cells via tape castingcitations
- 2024Fabrication framework for metal supported solid oxide cells via tape castingcitations
- 2023Humidity resistance and recovery of sintered sodium potassium niobate-based piezoelectricscitations
- 2023Humidity resistance and recovery of sintered sodium potassium niobate-based piezoelectricscitations
- 2023Performance and sulfur tolerance of a short stack with solid oxide cells using infiltrated strontium titanate based anodescitations
- 2023Low Temperature Performance and Durability of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Titanate Based Fuel Electrodes Using Reformate Fuelcitations
- 2022Piezoelectric properties of mechanochemically processed 0.67BiFeO3-0.33BaTiO3 ceramicscitations
- 2022Piezoelectric properties of mechanochemically processed 0.67BiFeO 3 -0.33BaTiO 3 ceramicscitations
- 2022Protective Coatings for Ferritic Stainless Steel Interconnect Materials in High Temperature Solid Oxide Electrolyser Atmospherescitations
- 2021Synthesis, characterization, fabrication, and electrochemical performance of transition metal doped LSCTA- as anode candidates for SOFCScitations
- 2021Porous Ceramics for Energy Applicationscitations
- 2021Performance of Metal Supported SOFCs Operated in HydrocarbonFuels and at Low (>650 ˚C) Temperaturescitations
- 2020Metal Supported SOFCs for Mobile Applications using Hydrocarbon Fuelscitations
- 2019Combining Transition Metals – An Approach towards High-Performing Coking Tolerant Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Anodescitations
- 2019Influence of sintering profile on the microstructure and electronic transport properties of Sr(Ti,Nb)O3 tapes for solid oxide cell applications
- 2019Internal reforming on Metal supported SOFCscitations
- 2018Scaling up aqueous processing of A-site deficient strontium titanate for SOFC anode supportscitations
- 2017Development of redox stable, multifunctional substrates for anode supported SOFCS
- 2017Enhanced densification of thin tape cast Ceria-Gadolinium Oxide (CGO) layers by rheological optimization of slurriescitations
- 2017Spinel-based coatings for metal supported solid oxide fuel cellscitations
- 2016Low cost porous MgO substrates for oxygen transport membranescitations
- 2016Low cost porous MgO substrates for oxygen transport membranescitations
- 2016Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) as dispersing agent for cerium-gadolinium oxide (CGO) suspensionscitations
- 2016Performance Factors and Sulfur Tolerance of Metal Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Nanostructured Ni:GDC Infiltrated Anodescitations
- 2015Rheological properties of poly (vinylpiyrrolidone) as a function of average molecular weight and its applications
- 2015Rheological properties of poly (vinylpiyrrolidone) as a function of average molecular weight and its applications
- 2015Performance Factors and Sulfur Tolerance of Metal Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Nanostructured Ni:GDC Infiltrated Anodescitations
- 2015Investigation of Novel Electrocatalysts for Metal Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells - Ru:GDCcitations
- 2015Kinetic Studies on Ni-YSZ Composite Electrodescitations
- 2014Sintering and Electrical Characterization of La and Nb Co‐doped SrTiO3 Electrode Materials for Solid Oxide Cell Applicationscitations
- 2014Creep behaviour of porous metal supports for solid oxide fuel cellscitations
- 2014Creep behaviour of porous metal supports for solid oxide fuel cellscitations
- 2013Transmission Electron Microscopy Specimen Preparation Method for Multiphase Porous Functional Ceramicscitations
- 2013Creep Behavior of Porous Supports in Metal-support Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- 2013Full Ceramic Fuel Cells Based on Strontium Titanate Anodes, An Approach Towards More Robust SOFCscitations
- 2013Infiltrated SrTiO3:FeCr‐based Anodes for Metal‐Supported SOFCcitations
- 2012Performance-Microstructure Relations in Ni/CGO Infiltrated Nb-doped SrTiO3 SOFC Anodescitations
- 2012A Preliminary Study on WO3‐Infiltrated W–Cu–ScYSZ Anodes for Low Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cellscitations
- 2012Infiltrated SrTiO3:FeCr-based anodes for metalsupported SOFC
- 2012Microstructural and electrical characterization of Nb-doped SrTiO3–YSZ composites for solid oxide cell electrodescitations
- 2012Microstructural evolution of nanosized Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9/Ni infiltrate in a Zr0.84Y0.16O1.92-Sr0.94Ti0.9Nb0.1O3-δ based SOFC anode under electrochemical evaluation
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Performance and sulfur tolerance of a short stack with solid oxide cells using infiltrated strontium titanate based anodes
Abstract
Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology offers reliable and efficient power generation from electrochemical oxidation of fuel gasses. State-of-the-art (SoA) anodes based on Ni cermets are prone to poisoning by fuel impurities, including sulfur. Next generation anode materials should be more robust towards sulfur poisoning e.g. in the event of failure or expiry of desulfurization units utilized in SOFC systems. Herein we present the performance and sulfur tolerance of short stacks with large area electrolyte supported cells with Ni:Ce<sub>0.8</sub>Gd<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>1.9</sub> (CGO) and FeNi:CGO co-infiltrated La<sub>0.4</sub>Sr<sub>0.4</sub>Fe<sub>0.03</sub>Ni<sub>0.03</sub>Ti<sub>0.94</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (LSFNT) anodes tested under real-life conditions using reformed grid natural gas and an upstream, bypassable desulfurization unit. The initial performance at 750 °C and 850 °C was similar to a SoA cell with Ni/CGO cermet anode for both types of infiltrate. Bypassing the desulfurization unit led to a much lower performance loss compared to SoA. Additionally, the cells with LSFNT anodes showed almost complete recovery of performance after stopping the exposure to sulfur, whereas the reference SoA cell experienced some degree of irreversible degradation. Based on the promising initial performance and tolerance towards failure of desulfurization units, LSFNT anodes infiltrated with non-noble electrocatalysts are attractive candidates for next generation SOFC systems.