Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Dellai, Alessandro

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 22

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020In-situ experimental benchmarking of solid oxide fuel cell metal interconnect solutions22citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Yang, Shicai
1 / 6 shared
Herle, Jan Van
1 / 8 shared
Bianco, Manuel
1 / 12 shared
Steinberger-Wilckens, Robert
1 / 38 shared
Caliandro, Priscilla
1 / 1 shared
Diethelm, Stefan
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Yang, Shicai
  • Herle, Jan Van
  • Bianco, Manuel
  • Steinberger-Wilckens, Robert
  • Caliandro, Priscilla
  • Diethelm, Stefan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

In-situ experimental benchmarking of solid oxide fuel cell metal interconnect solutions

  • Yang, Shicai
  • Dellai, Alessandro
  • Herle, Jan Van
  • Bianco, Manuel
  • Steinberger-Wilckens, Robert
  • Caliandro, Priscilla
  • Diethelm, Stefan
Abstract

The progress in the diffusion of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) as commercial devices is not paired by literature production. Articles describing the behaviour of SOFC stacks are rare because of confidentiality reasons for commercial suppliers while research centres prefer to focus on single components or low technology readiness level research.<br/><br/>This article aim to fill this gap presenting the analysis of three short stacks run in operative conditions for 10 000 h each. The stacks are characterized through voltage vs time curves, electron microscopy, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Focus is given on the interconnect; notably on the different types of coatings, varying for composition (MnCo2O4, MnCo1.8Fe0.2O4) and deposition technique (atmospheric plasma spray-APS, physical vapour deposition-PVD, wet powder spraying-WPS). Nitriding of the steel substrate as a solution to improve the chromium retention properties is tested as well.<br/><br/>Results: indicate that coating deposition technique is the most important parameter, with single repeat unit (SRU) containing PVD coating showing the lowest voltage degradation rate. Commercial ferritic stainless steel K41<br/>confirmed to be a reliable choice if coupled with a coating. Moreover, SRU containing WPS coating demonstrated to be more reliable than expected from standard area specific resistance 4-probe test.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • stainless steel
  • chromium
  • physical vapor deposition
  • electron microscopy
  • appearance potential spectroscopy