People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Oskouei, Asghar Vatani
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (10/10 displayed)
- 2024Experimental study on seismic performance of squat RC shear walls reinforced with hybrid steel and GFRP rebarscitations
- 2020The effect of elevated temperatures on the compressive section capacity of pultruded GFRP profilescitations
- 2019Effect of fibers configuration and thickness on tensile behavior of GFRP laminates subjected to elevated temperaturescitations
- 2018Effect of Sequential Exposure to UV Radiation and Water Vapor Condensation and Extreme Temperatures on the Mechanical Properties of GFRP Barscitations
- 2018Effect of applied stress and bar characteristics on the short-term creep behavior of FRP barscitations
- 2018Effect of the FRP sheet's arrays and NSM FRP bars on in-plane behavior of URM wallscitations
- 2018Flexural and web crippling properties of GFRP pultruded profiles subjected to wetting and drying cycles in different sea water conditionscitations
- 2017Experimental study of the punching behavior of GFRP reinforced lightweight concrete footingcitations
- 2017Enhancement of bond characteristics of ribbed-surface GFRP bars with concrete by using carbon fiber mat anchoragecitations
- 2016Effect of harsh environments on mechanical properties of GFRP pultruded profilescitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Effect of the FRP sheet's arrays and NSM FRP bars on in-plane behavior of URM walls
Abstract
<p>This paper studies the results of compression diagonal tests conducted on a series of retrofitted and non-retrofitted small-scale masonry walls (which are also known as wallettes). Wallettes with the same characteristics and mechanical properties of large masonry walls were retrofitted by using two arrays of glass fiber reinforcement polymer (GFRP) sheets (grid and diagonal), two arrays of carbon fiber reinforcement polymer (CFRP) sheets (grid and diagonal), and near surface mounted bars (steel and GFRP). FRP sheets were applied to both surfaces of the wallettes, and rebar was mounted onto one of the surfaces in two horizontal and two vertical arrangements. All of the methods significantly increased loading capability and ductility of wallettes. Wallettes retrofitted with near surface GFRP bars had the highest value of final load, and specimens retrofitted with CFRP sheets in a diagonal array demonstrated the highest ductility among all tested specimens. Wallettes retrofitted with near surface mounted steel bars showed poor performance in terms of both loading capability and ductility. This study also includes discussion of failure modes, elastic characteristics, shear stresses and strains, and other variables that impact retrofitting.</p>